H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Romina Oprandi vs Julia Schruff H2H: 1-1
Romina Oprandi and Julia Schruff are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julia Schruff leads 1–0 on clay, while Romina Oprandi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Romina Oprandi won the 2006 Portoroz third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 40
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 43
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2006* | Portoroz | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Romina Oprandi | 6-3 7-5 | Julia Schruff | Match data |
| Jul 21, 2006* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Julia Schruff | (w/o) | Romina Oprandi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Romina Oprandi | #895 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,694 | 54 | 88 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julia Schruff | #1,200 | #52 | 536 | 1,665 | 48 | 80 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Romina Oprandi | Julia Schruff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #117 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #256 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #81 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #119 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #82 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #132 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #61 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #131 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #114 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #397 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |