H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Rosalyn Fairbank vs Anne Smith H2H: 2-2

Rosalyn Fairbank and Anne Smith are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anne Smith leads 2–1 on carpet, while Rosalyn Fairbank leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Rosalyn Fairbank won the 1990 Oakland fourth round 7-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Anne Smith
Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 2, 1990* Oakland WTA 250 R16 Carpet Rosalyn Fairbank #26 7-6 6-1 Anne Smith Match data
Sep 23, 1989* Dallas WTA 250 QF Carpet Anne Smith 7-5 7-6 Rosalyn Fairbank #26 Match data
Jul 14, 1988* Newport WTA 250 R32 Grass Rosalyn Fairbank #42 6-4 6-2 Anne Smith Match data
Jan 29, 1981* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Anne Smith 6-2 6-1 Rosalyn Fairbank Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,933 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Anne Smith — — — 2,050 221 173 56.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Anne Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,525 0 0 1977 8–3 72.7% — 1,634 0 1
18 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,720 0 0 1978 14–7 66.7% — 1,784 0 2
19 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,681 0 0 1979 28–28 50.0% — 1,847 0 2
20 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,657 0 0 1980 21–21 50.0% — 1,866 0 2
21 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,904 0 0 1981 36–25 59.0% — 1,934 0 2
22 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,920 0 1 1982 27–19 58.7% — 1,899 0 2
23 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1 1983 11–9 55.0% — 1,897 0 2
24 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1 1984 1–2 33.3% — 1,873 0 2
25 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1 1985 10–4 71.4% — 1,899 0 3
26 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1 1986 8–13 38.1% — 1,701 0 3
27 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,775 0 1 1987 15–9 62.5% — 1,779 0 3
28 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,846 0 1 1988 8–8 50.0% — 1,773 0 3
29 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,789 0 1 1989 10–6 62.5% — 1,848 0 3
30 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1 1990 16–14 53.3% — 1,827 0 3
31 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,728 0 1 1991 8–5 61.5% — 1,820 0 3
32 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1 — — — — — — —