H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Rosalyn Fairbank vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 1-1
Rosalyn Fairbank and Catarina Lindqvist Ryan are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1989 Wimbledon quarterfinal 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 1989* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 7-5 7-5 | Rosalyn Fairbank | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1987* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Rosalyn Fairbank | 6-3 6-2 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosalyn Fairbank | #325 | #15 | 51 | 1,933 | 336 | 309 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Rosalyn Fairbank | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 15–22 | 40.5% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,904 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 24–19 | 55.8% | — | 1,920 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1984 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #32 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1985 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #38 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #28 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #36 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1989 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 1990 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #24 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #90 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #63 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #261 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |