H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Rosalyn Fairbank vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 1-1
Rosalyn Fairbank and Ginger Helgeson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ginger Helgeson leads 1–0 on clay, while Rosalyn Fairbank leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ginger Helgeson won the 1995 Hilton Head second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 1995* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Ginger Helgeson | 6-2 6-1 | Rosalyn Fairbank | Match data |
| Oct 14, 1993* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Rosalyn Fairbank | 6-4 4-6 7-6 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosalyn Fairbank | #325 | #15 | 51 | 1,933 | 336 | 309 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ginger Helgeson | #467 | #29 | 246 | 1,865 | 94 | 95 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Rosalyn Fairbank | Ginger Helgeson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 15–22 | 40.5% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,904 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 24–19 | 55.8% | — | 1,920 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #32 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #38 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #28 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #167 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #36 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #24 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #90 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #63 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #261 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |