H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Rosalyn Fairbank vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 2-1

Rosalyn Fairbank holds a 2–1 lead over Kimiko Date Krumm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Rosalyn Fairbank leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Rosalyn Fairbank won the 1993 Delray Beach second round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 3, 1993* Delray Beach WTA 250 R64 Hard Rosalyn Fairbank #52 6-2 6-4 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Jun 18, 1992* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Rosalyn Fairbank #85 7-6 6-1 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Jan 4, 1990* Brisbane WTA 500 R32 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-4 6-3 Rosalyn Fairbank #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,933 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,720 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,681 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,657 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,904 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,920 0 1 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,775 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,846 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,789 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,728 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8