H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Rosalyn Fairbank vs Liz Smylie H2H: 2-0

Rosalyn Fairbank holds a 2–0 lead over Liz Smylie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rosalyn Fairbank leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Rosalyn Fairbank won the 1989 Newport round of 16 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Liz Smylie
AUS Age 63 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rosalyn Fairbank #30 7-6 6-3 Liz Smylie #80 Match data Jul 21, 1989* R16 Newport WTA 250 Grass
Rosalyn Fairbank #37 6-3 6-3 Liz Smylie #103 Match data Jul 2, 1989* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rosalyn Fairbank — #15 51 1,932 336 310 52.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Liz Smylie — #20 29 1,824 161 189 46.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Liz Smylie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,539 0 0 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,630 0 1
18 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,723 0 0 1981 2–10 16.7% — 1,515 0 1
19 1980 22–21 51.2% — 1,673 0 0 1982 15–8 65.2% — 1,628 0 3
20 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,656 0 0 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,754 0 4
21 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,898 0 0 1984 13–18 41.9% #36 1,765 0 4
22 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,919 0 1 1985 16–19 45.7% #43 1,730 0 4
23 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1 1986 6–13 31.6% #114 1,669 0 4
24 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1 1987 20–14 58.8% #27 1,748 0 5
25 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1 1988 4–12 25.0% #153 1,607 0 5
26 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1 1989 21–22 48.8% #66 1,682 0 5
27 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,772 0 1 1990 15–16 48.4% #53 1,665 0 5
28 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,845 0 1 1991 9–16 36.0% #116 1,612 0 5
29 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,787 0 1 1992 0–1 0.0% #209 1,599 0 5
30 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1 1993 7–15 31.8% #125 1,549 0 5
31 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,726 0 1 1994 2–7 22.2% #192 1,515 0 5
32 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–4 0.0% — 1,704 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Liz Smylie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1978 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1980 — — — — — — — — 10 3 13 76.9% — — — —
18 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1981 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
19 1980 3 6 9 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — —
20 1981 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 8 13 38.5% 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 1985 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 9 7 16 56.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1985 13 11 24 54.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1986 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 1988 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1987 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1989 14 14 28 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1988 11 11 22 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 1989 6 8 14 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 1991 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 1990 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1993 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
31 1992 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 1993 9 11 20 45.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 110 219 49.8% 44 51 95 46.3% 128 76 204 62.7% 51 71 122 41.8% — 51 80 131 38.9% 11 19 30 36.7% 84 60 144 58.3% 13 29 42 31.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Liz Smylie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1978 1539 104.5 — — — — — — +66 75.0% +0.75 — 2–0 — +0.38 1980 1631 113.8 — — — — — — +66 63.6% +0.73 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) 103.1 +1.28
18 1979 1724 136.8 — — — — — -158 -4 61.3% +1.02 4–4 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.5 +0.54 1981 1516 99.1 — — — — +29 +16 +113 20.0% -1.68 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.89
19 1980 1674 128.0 — — — — -91 -31 +40 51.5% +0.05 6–9 (40%) 1–0 — -0.24 1982 1629 117.0 — — — — — +36 +60 59.3% +0.70 8–2 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 106.2 +1.74
20 1981 1657 123.2 — — — — -46 +16 +48 40.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 2–3 (40%) 103.3 +0.56 1983 1755 135.9 — — — — -170 -34 +77 54.4% +0.25 8–5 (62%) 3–3 (50%) 104.5 +2.04
21 1982 1898 150.4 — — — — -183 -229 +26 57.5% +0.52 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 105.2 -2.76 1984 1766 123.0 — — — — -246 -130 +139 45.6% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.6 -1.30
22 1983 1919 136.8 — — — — -80 -271 +30 53.1% +0.19 7–3 (70%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 -2.28 1985 1730 128.2 — — — — -158 — +131 47.1% -0.38 7–8 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 -0.26
23 1984 1767 136.3 — — — — +21 -163 +101 46.8% +0.05 7–8 (47%) 3–8 (27%) 94.2 +0.02 1986 1669 119.1 — — — — -123 -108 +185 38.5% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 -0.67
24 1985 1807 136.9 — — — — -15 -144 +36 51.3% +0.09 9–4 (69%) 9–2 (82%) 109.3 -1.69 1987 1748 133.3 — — — — -128 — +163 57.7% +0.17 5–5 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.3 +0.17
25 1986 1825 143.0 — — — — +15 -155 -18 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 5–4 (56%) 102.0 -2.28 1988 1607 97.6 — — — — -89 — +199 25.7% -1.91 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 +1.24
26 1987 1756 134.8 — — — — -59 -105 +159 50.0% +0.03 8–6 (57%) 5–1 (83%) 103.9 -0.44 1989 1682 124.9 — — — — -33 -171 +107 47.1% -0.16 10–6 (63%) 5–7 (42%) 101.1 +1.69
27 1988 1773 141.1 — — — — -53 -161 +181 56.0% +0.38 7–11 (39%) 8–5 (62%) 98.3 +0.44 1990 1666 124.4 — — — — +4 — +122 47.1% -0.23 7–3 (70%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +0.59
28 1989 1845 147.2 — — — — -105 -204 +177 57.8% +0.54 7–5 (58%) 6–8 (43%) 101.7 -0.47 1991 1613 115.0 — — — — -43 — +187 37.9% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 103.0 -0.32
29 1990 1788 137.4 — — — — -7 — +237 51.9% +0.13 11–3 (79%) 5–2 (71%) 108.9 +0.60 1992 1600 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01
30 1991 1637 127.8 — — — — +35 -73 +316 46.1% -0.10 3–7 (30%) 1–5 (17%) 88.8 +1.07 1993 1550 117.2 — — — — -36 — +259 37.0% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 0–2 — +0.46
31 1992 1727 133.0 — — — — -40 -177 +269 51.5% -0.04 3–3 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 100.5 -1.50 1994 1515 99.5 — — — — -31 — +232 31.6% -1.79 1–2 (33%) — — +0.11
32 1993 1766 146.5 — — — — -13 -176 +195 45.3% -0.44 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1705 104.3 — — — — -16 — — 0.0% -3.63 — — — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 1599 97.0 — — — — +22 — +239 15.8% -2.47 0–1 — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1933 143.7 — — — — -37 -133 +112 51.1% +0.08 105–88 (54%) 65–57 (53%) 104.8 -1.63 — 1824 127.4 — — — — -80 -43 +132 46.2% -0.37 67–54 (55%) 30–38 (44%) 100.0 +2.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.