H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Rosalyn Fairbank vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 5-3

Rosalyn Fairbank holds a 5–3 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Rosalyn Fairbank leads 3–1 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1995 Chicago third round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5 – 3
8 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 9, 1995* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Lori Mcneil #17 6-2 6-2 Rosalyn Fairbank #284 Match data
Jul 27, 1991* Westchester WTA 250 SF Hard Lori Mcneil #24 5-7 6-2 6-1 Rosalyn Fairbank #58 Match data
Mar 19, 1990* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Rosalyn Fairbank #21 6-2 2-6 6-3 Lori Mcneil #55 Match data
Nov 11, 1988* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Rosalyn Fairbank #43 5-7 6-3 6-2 Lori Mcneil #13 Match data
Jul 16, 1988* Newport WTA 250 SF Grass Lori Mcneil #9 3-6 7-5 6-3 Rosalyn Fairbank #42 Match data
Jun 26, 1988* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Rosalyn Fairbank #50 7-6 6-4 Lori Mcneil #11 Match data
Jul 18, 1987* Newport WTA 250 QF Grass Rosalyn Fairbank #23 5-7 6-4 6-4 Lori Mcneil #11 Match data
Jun 12, 1987* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Rosalyn Fairbank #31 6-4 2-6 6-2 Lori Mcneil #12 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,933 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,525 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,720 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,681 0 0 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,657 0 0 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,904 0 0 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,920 0 1 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,775 0 1 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,846 0 1 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,789 0 1 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,728 0 1 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11