H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Rosalyn Fairbank vs Maria Strandlund Tomsvik H2H: 1-0

Rosalyn Fairbank holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Strandlund Tomsvik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rosalyn Fairbank leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Rosalyn Fairbank won the 1992 Birmingham round of 64 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik
SWE

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rosalyn Fairbank #82 6-1 6-4 Maria Strandlund Tomsvik Match data Jun 10, 1992* R64 Birmingham Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,932 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik — — — 1,625 42 77 35.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Rosalyn Fairbank Maria Strandlund Tomsvik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,539 0 0 1987 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0
1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,723 0 0 1988 6–7 46.2% — 1,578 0 0
1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,677 0 0 1989 10–14 41.7% — 1,611 0 0
1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,656 0 0 1990 7–16 30.4% — 1,588 0 0
1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,897 0 0 1991 6–12 33.3% — 1,553 0 0
1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,918 0 1 1992 0–3 0.0% — 1,520 0 0
1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,766 0 1 1993 2–3 40.0% — 1,559 0 0
1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1 1994 0–2 0.0% — 1,546 0 0
1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1 1995 8–13 38.1% — 1,545 0 0
1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,755 0 1 1996 2–5 28.6% — 1,526 0 0
1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,772 0 1 1997 0–1 0.0% — 1,515 0 0
1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,845 0 1 — — — — — — —
1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,787 0 1 — — — — — — —
1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1 — — — — — — —
1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,726 0 1 — — — — — — —
1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1 — — — — — — —
1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1 — — — — — — —
1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,598 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Rosalyn Fairbank Maria Strandlund Tomsvik
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1978 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
1979 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1988 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1980 3 6 9 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1989 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
1981 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 1990 5 9 14 35.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1982 7 3 10 70.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 8 13 38.5% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
1983 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 1992 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1984 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 1993 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
1985 13 11 24 54.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1986 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 1995 4 3 7 57.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
1987 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1988 11 11 22 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1989 6 8 14 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1990 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1991 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1992 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1993 9 11 20 45.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1995 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 109 110 219 49.8% 44 51 95 46.3% 128 76 204 62.7% 51 70 121 42.1% Career 19 28 47 40.4% 14 30 44 31.8% 6 9 15 40.0% 3 10 13 23.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Rosalyn Fairbank Maria Strandlund Tomsvik
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1978 1539 104.5 — — — — — — +66 75.0% +0.75 — 2–0 — +0.38 1987 1504 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +1.20 0–1 — — +0.37
1979 1724 136.7 — — — — — -159 -3 61.3% +1.02 4–4 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.5 +0.70 1988 1578 125.8 — — — — +10 -8 — 45.5% -0.15 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 102.9 +0.45
1980 1678 128.5 — — — — -83 -36 +37 52.1% +0.08 6–8 (43%) 1–0 — -0.49 1989 1612 115.4 — — — — -1 -33 — 44.3% -0.85 6–7 (46%) 1–1 — +0.30
1981 1657 122.8 — — — — -41 +16 +48 40.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.67 1990 1589 112.6 — — — — +13 -55 — 32.7% -1.00 5–3 (63%) 0–5 (0%) 99.0 -0.92
1982 1897 150.2 — — — — -180 -228 +28 57.5% +0.52 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 105.2 -2.75 1991 1554 113.6 — — — — -13 -34 +68 35.7% -0.98 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.8 -0.11
1983 1919 136.6 — — — — -79 -271 +29 53.1% +0.19 7–3 (70%) 1–4 (20%) 101.2 -2.11 1992 1520 104.3 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.32
1984 1767 136.1 — — — — +21 -164 +101 46.8% +0.05 7–8 (47%) 3–8 (27%) 94.2 +0.03 1993 1560 135.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 0–1 — -0.82
1985 1806 136.7 — — — — -14 -143 +37 51.3% +0.09 9–4 (69%) 9–2 (82%) 109.3 -1.60 1994 1546 102.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–2 — -0.30
1986 1824 142.9 — — — — +15 -154 -17 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 5–4 (56%) 102.0 -2.16 1995 1545 114.4 — — — — +8 -11 +27 40.8% -0.86 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.97
1987 1756 134.7 — — — — -60 -105 +159 50.0% +0.03 8–6 (57%) 5–1 (83%) 103.9 -0.46 1996 1527 113.8 — — — — +25 — — 33.3% -0.60 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.67
1988 1772 141.1 — — — — -53 -160 +181 56.0% +0.38 7–11 (39%) 8–5 (62%) 98.3 +0.48 1997 1515 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.13
1989 1845 147.2 — — — — -106 -205 +177 57.8% +0.54 7–5 (58%) 6–8 (43%) 101.7 -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1990 1787 137.3 — — — — -6 — +236 51.9% +0.13 11–3 (79%) 5–2 (71%) 108.9 +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1991 1637 127.7 — — — — +34 -74 +316 46.1% -0.10 3–7 (30%) 1–5 (17%) 88.8 +1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1992 1726 133.0 — — — — -39 -176 +270 51.5% -0.04 3–3 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 100.5 -1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1993 1766 146.5 — — — — -14 -176 +196 45.3% -0.44 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1994 1704 104.2 — — — — -15 — — 0.0% -3.63 — — — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1995 1599 97.0 — — — — +23 — +239 15.8% -2.47 0–1 — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1932 143.7 — — — — -36 -134 +112 51.1% +0.09 105–87 (55%) 65–57 (53%) 105.0 -1.56 Career 1625 123.4 — — — — +6 -29 +45 38.2% -0.87 23–24 (49%) 6–16 (27%) 97.8 -1.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.