H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Rosalyn Fairbank vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 2-2

Rosalyn Fairbank and Mima Jausovec are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Rosalyn Fairbank won the 1983 Mahwah fourth round 6-4 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 69 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 26, 1983* Mahwah WTA 250 R16 Hard Rosalyn Fairbank 6-4 4-6 6-4 Mima Jausovec Match data
Feb 6, 1982* Detroit WTA 250 SF Carpet Mima Jausovec 6-3 6-3 Rosalyn Fairbank Match data
Jan 22, 1981* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Rosalyn Fairbank 7-5 3-6 6-3 Mima Jausovec Match data
Dec 4, 1980* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Grass Mima Jausovec 6-0 6-2 Rosalyn Fairbank Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,933 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,088 339 246 57.9% 1 1 0 1 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Mima Jausovec
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
17 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,525 0 0 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,790 0 1
18 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,720 0 0 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,804 0 1
19 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,681 0 0 1976 33–16 67.3% — 1,996 0 4
20 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,657 0 0 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,008 1 5
21 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,904 0 0 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,922 1 6
22 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,920 0 1 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,866 1 6
23 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,941 1 6
24 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,010 1 6
25 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,861 1 7
26 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7
27 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,775 0 1 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7
28 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,846 0 1 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7
29 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,789 0 1 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7
30 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7
31 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,728 0 1 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7
32 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1 — — — — — — —