H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Rosalyn Fairbank vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 2-4

Nathalie Herreman holds a 4–2 lead over Rosalyn Fairbank in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Nathalie Herreman leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1993 San Diego third round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 4, 1993* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Nathalie Herreman #122 6-3 6-3 Rosalyn Fairbank #70 Match data
Feb 27, 1991* Palm Springs WTA 250 R64 Hard Rosalyn Fairbank #24 6-2 6-2 Nathalie Herreman #58 Match data
Jan 10, 1991* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Rosalyn Fairbank #21 6-2 3-6 6-4 Nathalie Herreman #64 Match data
Aug 6, 1987* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Nathalie Herreman #79 7-6 6-3 Rosalyn Fairbank #18 Match data
Apr 11, 1984* Hilton Head WTA 250 R64 Clay Nathalie Herreman #69 7-6 6-4 Rosalyn Fairbank #27 Match data
May 25, 1983* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Nathalie Herreman 6-1 7-5 Rosalyn Fairbank Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,933 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,728 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,525 0 0 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,548 0 0
18 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,720 0 0 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,564 0 0
19 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,681 0 0 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,543 0 0
20 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,657 0 0 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,718 0 1
21 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,904 0 0 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,641 0 1
22 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,920 0 1 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,606 0 1
23 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,684 0 1
25 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,619 0 1
26 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,775 0 1 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,622 0 1
28 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,846 0 1 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,789 0 1 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1
30 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,728 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1 — — — — — — —