H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Rosalyn Fairbank vs Tami Whitlinger Jones H2H: 1-1

Rosalyn Fairbank and Tami Whitlinger Jones are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tami Whitlinger Jones won the 1994 Indian Wells Open round of 32 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Tami Whitlinger Jones
USA Age 57

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tami Whitlinger Jones 6-2 6-4 Rosalyn Fairbank #63 Match data Feb 21, 1994 R32 Indian Wells Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Rosalyn Fairbank #21 6-4 6-1 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data Jan 18, 1991* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,932 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tami Whitlinger Jones — — — 1,777 106 135 44.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Tami Whitlinger Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,539 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
18 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,723 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,677 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,656 0 0 1989 4–5 44.4% — 1,525 0 0
21 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,897 0 0 1990 12–16 42.9% — 1,576 0 0
22 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,918 0 1 1991 17–18 48.6% — 1,682 0 0
23 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,766 0 1 1992 13–16 44.8% — 1,644 0 0
24 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1 1993 13–19 40.6% — 1,650 0 0
25 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1 1994 16–18 47.1% — 1,709 0 0
26 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,755 0 1 1995 19–18 51.4% — 1,700 0 0
27 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,772 0 1 1996 10–13 43.5% — 1,694 0 0
28 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,845 0 1 1997 2–11 15.4% — 1,596 0 0
29 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,787 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,726 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,598 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Tami Whitlinger Jones
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1978 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 3 6 9 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1981 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 1989 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 8 13 38.5% 1990 8 8 16 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1985 13 11 24 54.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 11 10 21 52.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1986 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 1994 13 12 25 52.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 1987 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1995 8 9 17 47.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1988 11 11 22 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 1989 6 8 14 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 1997 1 5 6 16.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1990 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 9 11 20 45.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 110 219 49.8% 44 51 95 46.3% 128 76 204 62.7% 51 70 121 42.1% — 63 73 136 46.3% 24 35 59 40.7% 7 12 19 36.8% 12 15 27 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Tami Whitlinger Jones
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1978 1539 104.5 — — — — — — +66 75.0% +0.75 — 2–0 — +0.38 1986 1494 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.05
18 1979 1724 136.7 — — — — — -159 -3 61.3% +1.02 4–4 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.5 +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 1678 128.5 — — — — -83 -36 +37 52.1% +0.08 6–8 (43%) 1–0 — -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1981 1657 122.8 — — — — -41 +16 +48 40.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.67 1989 1525 121.7 — — — — +38 — — 52.4% +0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +0.49
21 1982 1897 150.2 — — — — -180 -228 +28 57.5% +0.52 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 105.2 -2.75 1990 1577 126.7 — — — — +71 -98 — 43.9% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 1–6 (14%) 96.8 +0.78
22 1983 1919 136.6 — — — — -79 -271 +29 53.1% +0.19 7–3 (70%) 1–4 (20%) 101.2 -2.11 1991 1682 133.2 — — — — -51 -22 -78 49.4% -0.26 6–7 (46%) 8–2 (80%) 106.6 -0.08
23 1984 1767 136.1 — — — — +21 -164 +101 46.8% +0.05 7–8 (47%) 3–8 (27%) 94.2 +0.03 1992 1645 120.9 — — — — +15 -10 — 41.0% -0.59 4–1 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 102.8 -0.65
24 1985 1806 136.7 — — — — -14 -143 +37 51.3% +0.09 9–4 (69%) 9–2 (82%) 109.3 -1.60 1993 1651 135.8 — — — — +45 -78 -87 41.7% -0.75 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 99.7 -1.72
25 1986 1824 142.9 — — — — +15 -154 -17 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 5–4 (56%) 102.0 -2.16 1994 1709 145.5 — — — — +28 — — 45.8% -0.15 3–5 (38%) 1–5 (17%) 97.5 -1.10
26 1987 1756 134.7 — — — — -60 -105 +159 50.0% +0.03 8–6 (57%) 5–1 (83%) 103.9 -0.46 1995 1701 136.6 — — — — -14 -37 -134 53.8% +0.30 6–11 (35%) 6–4 (60%) 96.8 -1.16
27 1988 1772 141.1 — — — — -53 -160 +181 56.0% +0.38 7–11 (39%) 8–5 (62%) 98.3 +0.48 1996 1694 132.0 — — — — +28 -56 — 42.3% -0.48 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 103.6 -0.18
28 1989 1845 147.2 — — — — -106 -205 +177 57.8% +0.54 7–5 (58%) 6–8 (43%) 101.7 -0.49 1997 1596 120.8 — — — — +84 -20 — 25.8% -1.55 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 93.1 -0.98
29 1990 1787 137.3 — — — — -6 — +236 51.9% +0.13 11–3 (79%) 5–2 (71%) 108.9 +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 1637 127.7 — — — — +34 -74 +316 46.1% -0.10 3–7 (30%) 1–5 (17%) 88.8 +1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 1726 133.0 — — — — -39 -176 +270 51.5% -0.04 3–3 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 100.5 -1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 1766 146.5 — — — — -14 -176 +196 45.3% -0.44 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1704 104.2 — — — — -15 — — 0.0% -3.63 — — — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 1599 97.0 — — — — +23 — +239 15.8% -2.47 0–1 — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1932 143.7 — — — — -36 -134 +112 51.1% +0.09 105–87 (55%) 65–57 (53%) 105.0 -1.56 — 1778 139.7 — — — — +23 -42 -104 45.0% -0.32 33–44 (43%) 25–32 (44%) 97.2 -1.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.