H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Rosalyn Fairbank vs Zina Garrison H2H: 1-7

Zina Garrison holds a 7–1 lead over Rosalyn Fairbank in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 3–0 on carpet and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1992 San Diego third round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 7
8 main draw meetings
Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 27, 1992* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Carpet Zina Garrison #14 6-3 6-2 Rosalyn Fairbank #52 Match data
Jun 28, 1992* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Zina Garrison #14 6-4 6-2 Rosalyn Fairbank #60 Match data
Oct 26, 1991* Brighton WTA 250 R16 Carpet Zina Garrison #12 6-4 6-4 Rosalyn Fairbank #78 Match data
Aug 1, 1991* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Zina Garrison #11 6-3 6-4 Rosalyn Fairbank #50 Match data
Feb 15, 1991* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Zina Garrison #10 6-2 6-2 Rosalyn Fairbank #21 Match data
Jan 11, 1991* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Zina Garrison #10 6-3 6-3 Rosalyn Fairbank #21 Match data
Aug 17, 1990* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R16 Hard Zina Garrison #4 6-2 6-0 Rosalyn Fairbank #25 Match data
May 30, 1985* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Rosalyn Fairbank #34 7-6(4) 2-6 13-11 Zina Garrison #7 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,933 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1
17 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,525 0 0 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1
18 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,720 0 0 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1
19 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,681 0 0 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1
20 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,657 0 0 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
21 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,904 0 0 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4
22 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,920 0 1 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5
23 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7
24 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7
25 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10
26 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11
27 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,775 0 1 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
28 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,846 0 1 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12
29 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,789 0 1 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14
31 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,728 0 1 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15
33 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1 — — — — — — —