Rosemary Pearson
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annette Coe | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 7, 1974 | H2H |
| Lindsey Beaven | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 19, 1974 | H2H |
| Jackie Fayter | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 1, 1972 | H2H |
| Greta Stirton | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jun 6, 1974 | H2H |
| S Preece | 1 | 0 | 1 | Apr 24, 1974 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Rosemary Pearson vs S Preece H2H: 1-0
Rosemary Pearson holds a 1–0 lead over S Preece in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rosemary Pearson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rosemary Pearson won the 1974 Norwich round of 64 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosemary Pearson | 7-5 6-4 | S Preece | Match data | Apr 24, 1974* | R64 | Norwich | WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosemary Pearson | — | — | — | 1,523 | 12 | 20 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| S Preece | — | — | — | 1,500 | 1 | 8 | 11.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Rosemary Pearson | S Preece | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,426 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Rosemary Pearson | S Preece | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Clay | Grass | Yr | Clay | Grass | ||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1969 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1970 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1972 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1975 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1973 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1974 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | Career | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Rosemary Pearson | S Preece | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1969 | 1485 | 96.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | 0.00 | 1973 | 1466 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.75 | — | — | — | +0.47 |
| 1970 | 1485 | 96.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.15 | 1974 | 1441 | 94.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.08 |
| 1972 | 1471 | 95.5 | — | — | — | — | — | -15 | +74 | 42.3% | -0.27 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | +1.89 | 1975 | 1420 | 93.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | 25.0% | -1.75 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.52 |
| 1973 | 1436 | 101.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +20 | +43 | 40.0% | -0.72 | 1–4 (20%) | — | — | +1.09 | 1977 | 1406 | 92.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +0.10 |
| 1974 | 1426 | 92.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +5 | — | 30.8% | -1.92 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1523 | 94.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +7 | +64 | 36.8% | -0.96 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–0 | — | +12.58 | Career | 1500 | 89.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | 11.1% | -2.61 | — | 0–1 | — | +13.00 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
S Preece
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pauline Elliott | 0 | 1 | 1 | May 25, 1977 | H2H |
| A Du Toit | 0 | 1 | 1 | May 7, 1975 | H2H |
| Barbara Wanke | 1 | 0 | 1 | May 6, 1975 | H2H |
| Murray | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 25, 1975 | H2H |
| Annette Coe | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 16, 1975 | H2H |