H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Rosie Casals vs Andrea Jaeger H2H: 0-3

Andrea Jaeger holds a 3–0 lead over Rosie Casals in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andrea Jaeger leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1982 Eastbourne third round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosie Casals
USA Age 77 Right-Handed 159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Andrea Jaeger
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 17, 1982* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Andrea Jaeger 6-3 6-0 Rosie Casals Match data
Jun 19, 1980* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Andrea Jaeger 6-0 6-3 Rosie Casals Match data
Jan 31, 1980* Seattle WTA 250 R32 Carpet Andrea Jaeger 6-3 6-1 Rosie Casals Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rosie Casals #207 #55 — 2,203 594 322 64.8% 0 1 0 2 9 12
Andrea Jaeger #225 #3 — 2,280 257 90 74.1% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosie Casals Andrea Jaeger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,522 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1980 62–18 77.5% — 2,169 0 4
16 — — — — — — — 1981 61–18 77.2% — 2,179 0 7
17 — — — — — — — 1982 65–20 76.5% — 2,170 0 9
18 — — — — — — — 1983 50–18 73.5% — 2,091 0 10
19 1968 36–14 72.0% — 1,760 0 1 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,015 0 10
20 1969 42–19 68.9% — 1,874 0 1 1985 5–5 50.0% — 1,932 0 10
21 1970 52–21 71.2% — 2,035 0 4 1986 0–1 0.0% #225 1,907 0 10
22 1971 92–31 74.8% — 2,162 0 7 1987 3–2 60.0% — 1,882 0 10
23 1972 64–26 71.1% — 2,098 0 10 — — — — — — —
24 1973 81–28 74.3% — 2,122 0 12 — — — — — — —
25 1974 43–16 72.9% — 2,127 0 12 — — — — — — —
26 1975 20–14 58.8% — 1,995 0 12 — — — — — — —
27 1976 39–17 69.6% — 2,122 0 12 — — — — — — —
28 1977 41–20 67.2% — 2,044 0 12 — — — — — — —
29 1978 24–15 61.5% — 2,019 0 12 — — — — — — —
30 1979 19–26 42.2% — 1,824 0 12 — — — — — — —
31 1980 14–25 35.9% — 1,676 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 1981 12–14 46.2% — 1,692 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 1982 4–8 33.3% — 1,670 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 1983 9–12 42.9% — 1,662 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 1984 1–4 20.0% #172 1,610 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 1985 1–4 20.0% — 1,574 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 1986 0–2 0.0% #207 1,548 0 12 — — — — — — —
39 1988 0–2 0.0% — 1,523 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 1989 0–2 0.0% — 1,500 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 12 — — — — — — —
42 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 12 — — — — — — —