H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Rosie Casals vs Anne Smith H2H: 1-2

Anne Smith holds a 2–1 lead over Rosie Casals in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anne Smith leads 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1981 Minneapolis round of 32 6-3 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosie Casals
USA Age 78 Right-Handed 159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Anne Smith
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Smith 6-3 7-6 Rosie Casals Match data Oct 1, 1981* R32 Minneapolis WTA 250 Carpet
Anne Smith 6-0 6-0 Rosie Casals Match data Oct 3, 1980* R16 Minneapolis WTA 250 Carpet
Rosie Casals 6-4 5-7 6-2 Anne Smith Match data Mar 17, 1978* R16 Boston WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rosie Casals — #6 — 2,213 594 323 64.8% 0 0 0 3 9 12
Anne Smith — — — 2,053 221 173 56.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosie Casals Anne Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1977 8–3 72.7% — 1,633 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1978 14–7 66.7% — 1,776 0 2
19 1968 36–14 72.0% — 1,750 0 1 1979 28–28 50.0% — 1,850 0 2
20 1969 42–19 68.9% — 1,877 0 1 1980 21–21 50.0% — 1,870 0 2
21 1970 52–21 71.2% — 2,043 0 4 1981 36–25 59.0% — 1,938 0 2
22 1971 92–31 74.8% — 2,172 0 7 1982 27–19 58.7% — 1,900 0 2
23 1972 64–26 71.1% — 2,105 0 10 1983 11–9 55.0% — 1,899 0 2
24 1973 81–28 74.3% — 2,139 0 12 1984 1–2 33.3% — 1,875 0 2
25 1974 43–17 71.7% — 2,136 0 12 1985 10–4 71.4% — 1,901 0 3
26 1975 20–14 58.8% — 2,002 0 12 1986 8–13 38.1% — 1,719 0 3
27 1976 39–17 69.6% #6 2,127 0 12 1987 15–9 62.5% — 1,786 0 3
28 1977 41–20 67.2% #6 2,057 0 12 1988 8–8 50.0% — 1,778 0 3
29 1978 24–15 61.5% — 2,013 0 12 1989 10–6 62.5% — 1,851 0 3
30 1979 19–26 42.2% — 1,828 0 12 1990 16–14 53.3% — 1,827 0 3
31 1980 14–25 35.9% — 1,680 0 12 1991 8–5 61.5% — 1,821 0 3
32 1981 12–14 46.2% — 1,687 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 1982 4–8 33.3% — 1,667 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 1983 9–12 42.9% — 1,661 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 1984 1–4 20.0% #172 1,609 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 1985 1–4 20.0% — 1,573 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,547 0 12 — — — — — — —
39 1988 0–2 0.0% — 1,523 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 1989 0–2 0.0% — 1,499 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 12 — — — — — — —
42 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rosie Casals Anne Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
19 1968 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 8 26 69.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 1979 9 6 15 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 11 13 24 45.8%
20 1969 4 4 8 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1980 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 11 19 42.1%
21 1970 8 3 11 72.7% 29 8 37 78.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 16 11 27 59.3%
22 1971 14 4 18 77.8% 25 10 35 71.4% 22 8 30 73.3% 31 9 40 77.5% 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 17 13 30 56.7%
23 1972 16 6 22 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 24 8 32 75.0% 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0%
24 1973 18 5 23 78.3% 20 5 25 80.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 31 14 45 68.9% 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1974 6 4 10 60.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 23 7 30 76.7% 1985 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
26 1975 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 1976 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 12 37 67.6% 1987 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 1977 14 5 19 73.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 1 5 80.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1988 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1978 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% 1989 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 7 3 10 70.0%
30 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 11 13 24 45.8% 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 1980 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 7 12 19 36.8% 1991 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
32 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1983 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 121 75 196 61.7% 132 65 197 67.0% 144 69 213 67.6% 197 113 310 63.5% — 67 49 116 57.8% 20 24 44 45.5% 37 27 64 57.8% 88 73 161 54.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rosie Casals Anne Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1634 138.5 — — — — +87 — — 70.4% +1.74 2–3 (40%) — — +1.55
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1776 139.7 — — — — +30 — — 68.3% +1.39 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.7 +0.91
19 1968 1751 130.0 — — — — +41 -201 -25 68.8% +1.61 7–9 (44%) — — +0.46 1979 1850 152.8 — — — — -10 -187 -233 48.5% -0.04 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 108.4 -3.72
20 1969 1878 140.7 — — — — -130 -92 +93 64.3% +1.09 12–6 (67%) — — -4.14 1980 1870 145.4 — — — — -29 -181 -221 47.8% -0.08 6–4 (60%) 4–5 (44%) 102.0 -5.91
21 1970 2043 161.0 — — — — -151 +10 +19 68.1% +1.60 11–5 (69%) 1–3 (25%) 104.5 -10.75 1981 1938 153.9 — — — — +39 -233 -158 57.9% +0.56 9–9 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 98.6 -4.67
22 1971 2173 168.5 — — — — +114 -75 -19 71.2% +1.62 18–13 (58%) 6–9 (40%) 96.2 -13.17 1982 1901 157.3 — — — — +44 -218 -38 60.2% +0.58 5–8 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 97.3 -1.41
23 1972 2106 158.7 — — — — +68 -51 +59 66.5% +1.41 15–7 (68%) 9–6 (60%) 102.7 -8.31 1983 1900 140.2 — — — — +41 — — 51.1% +0.02 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 -2.39
24 1973 2139 165.9 — — — — +112 -17 +17 71.1% +1.70 15–13 (54%) 8–12 (40%) 96.6 -10.99 1984 1876 92.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — 0–1 — -0.30
25 1974 2136 163.5 — — — — +103 +14 +14 68.8% +1.15 6–8 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 96.0 -9.26 1985 1902 131.2 — — — — — -250 -5 64.5% +0.90 3–0 (100%) 2–0 — -1.35
26 1975 2003 147.3 — — — — +25 +90 +135 59.8% +0.83 5–9 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 89.5 -2.82 1986 1719 121.0 — — — — +23 -56 — 40.9% -0.36 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.84
27 1976 2128 162.5 — — — — +44 -45 +52 65.5% +1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 102.3 -7.85 1987 1786 132.0 — — — — +8 — +61 60.0% +0.69 4–3 (57%) 0–1 — +0.59
28 1977 2058 157.4 — — — — +113 -43 +129 64.5% +0.90 8–6 (57%) 6–5 (55%) 100.5 -6.67 1988 1778 135.5 — — — — +14 — — 50.0% +0.21 1–1 0–2 — -0.73
29 1978 2014 156.7 — — — — +89 -40 +109 57.0% +0.57 10–7 (59%) 1–5 (17%) 96.0 -3.72 1989 1851 140.5 — — — — -5 — — 58.3% +0.50 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 -0.05
30 1979 1828 144.5 — — — — +54 +109 +234 46.6% -0.42 7–10 (41%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -3.07 1990 1828 147.1 — — — — -7 — +19 53.7% +0.49 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 98.2 -1.19
31 1980 1681 130.9 — — — — +19 — +233 40.4% -0.67 3–8 (27%) 3–8 (27%) 89.1 -2.38 1991 1822 132.5 — — — — 0 — — 60.7% +0.46 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.30
32 1981 1687 134.5 — — — — +87 +183 +144 46.8% +0.19 5–7 (42%) 0–4 (0%) 91.4 +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1982 1668 113.9 — — — — +43 — +125 39.3% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1983 1662 117.4 — — — — -25 — +150 44.9% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 1–0 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1984 1609 94.3 — — — — — — — 18.2% -2.82 1–0 — — +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1985 1574 92.4 — — — — +9 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1986 1548 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1988 1523 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1989 1500 89.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1990 1491 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1991 1476 94.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2214 159.5 — — — — +65 -31 +61 62.3% +0.97 134–120 (53%) 55–68 (45%) 91.0 -9.04 — 2053 154.5 — — — — +14 -191 -74 54.9% +0.38 58–49 (54%) 38–35 (52%) 106.2 -4.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.