H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Rosie Casals vs Barbara Potter H2H: 1-1

Rosie Casals and Barbara Potter are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Potter won the 1980 Las Vegas round of 32 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosie Casals
USA Age 78 Right-Handed 159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Barbara Potter
USA Age 65 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Potter 6-2 6-3 Rosie Casals Match data Sep 18, 1980* R32 Las Vegas WTA 250 Hard
Rosie Casals 6-7 7-6 6-3 Barbara Potter Match data Oct 25, 1979* R32 Tampa WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rosie Casals — #6 — 2,213 594 323 64.8% 0 0 0 3 9 12
Barbara Potter — #8 63 2,098 303 191 61.3% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosie Casals Barbara Potter
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1978 4–7 36.4% — 1,532 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1979 8–22 26.7% — 1,620 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1980 27–22 55.1% — 1,875 0 0
19 1968 36–14 72.0% — 1,750 0 1 1981 47–23 67.1% #10 1,944 0 0
20 1969 42–19 68.9% — 1,877 0 1 1982 43–22 66.2% #8 1,998 0 2
21 1970 52–21 71.2% — 2,043 0 4 1983 28–20 58.3% — 1,851 0 2
22 1971 92–31 74.8% — 2,172 0 7 1984 35–17 67.3% #12 1,952 0 2
23 1972 64–26 71.1% — 2,105 0 10 1985 31–16 66.0% — 1,900 0 3
24 1973 81–28 74.3% — 2,139 0 12 1986 14–10 58.3% #26 1,881 0 3
25 1974 43–17 71.7% — 2,136 0 12 1987 25–13 65.8% #12 1,899 0 4
26 1975 20–14 58.8% — 2,002 0 12 1988 36–14 72.0% #10 1,919 0 5
27 1976 39–17 69.6% #6 2,127 0 12 1989 5–5 50.0% #106 1,845 0 5
28 1977 41–20 67.2% #6 2,057 0 12 — — — — — — —
29 1978 24–15 61.5% — 2,013 0 12 — — — — — — —
30 1979 19–26 42.2% — 1,828 0 12 — — — — — — —
31 1980 14–25 35.9% — 1,680 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 1981 12–14 46.2% — 1,687 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 1982 4–8 33.3% — 1,667 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 1983 9–12 42.9% — 1,661 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 1984 1–4 20.0% #172 1,609 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 1985 1–4 20.0% — 1,573 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,547 0 12 — — — — — — —
39 1988 0–2 0.0% — 1,523 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 1989 0–2 0.0% — 1,499 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 12 — — — — — — —
42 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rosie Casals Barbara Potter
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 4 8 12 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 19 14 33 57.6%
19 1968 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 8 26 69.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 1981 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 12 6 18 66.7% 27 14 41 65.9%
20 1969 4 4 8 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 28 10 38 73.7%
21 1970 8 3 11 72.7% 29 8 37 78.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1983 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 10 8 18 55.6%
22 1971 14 4 18 77.8% 25 10 35 71.4% 22 8 30 73.3% 31 9 40 77.5% 1984 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 11 4 15 73.3% 17 9 26 65.4%
23 1972 16 6 22 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 24 8 32 75.0% 1985 12 4 16 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 7 16 56.3%
24 1973 18 5 23 78.3% 20 5 25 80.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 31 14 45 68.9% 1986 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
25 1974 6 4 10 60.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 23 7 30 76.7% 1987 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8%
26 1975 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 1988 25 9 34 73.5% — — — — 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 1976 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 12 37 67.6% 1989 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1977 14 5 19 73.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 1 5 80.0% 16 10 26 61.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1978 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 11 13 24 45.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1980 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 7 12 19 36.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1983 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 121 75 196 61.7% 132 65 197 67.0% 144 69 213 67.6% 197 113 310 63.5% — 89 54 143 62.2% 5 8 13 38.5% 68 39 107 63.6% 141 90 231 61.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rosie Casals Barbara Potter
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1533 114.1 — — — — +58 — +55 35.7% -1.14 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.26
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1621 143.2 — — — — +30 -115 -41 30.3% -0.89 4–6 (40%) 1–8 (11%) 95.5 -1.66
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1876 153.1 — — — — +17 — -301 56.8% +0.53 4–11 (27%) 5–6 (45%) 94.6 +0.47
19 1968 1751 130.0 — — — — +41 -201 -25 68.8% +1.61 7–9 (44%) — — +0.46 1981 1944 150.6 — — — — -2 — -145 63.1% +0.79 12–7 (63%) 9–10 (47%) 101.6 -1.65
20 1969 1878 140.7 — — — — -130 -92 +93 64.3% +1.09 12–6 (67%) — — -4.14 1982 1999 162.9 — — — — +57 — -127 63.3% +0.89 10–7 (59%) 12–14 (46%) 102.4 -2.52
21 1970 2043 161.0 — — — — -151 +10 +19 68.1% +1.60 11–5 (69%) 1–3 (25%) 104.5 -10.75 1983 1852 139.4 — — — — +53 -246 +13 58.6% +0.77 6–9 (40%) 8–8 (50%) 93.0 +1.63
22 1971 2173 168.5 — — — — +114 -75 -19 71.2% +1.62 18–13 (58%) 6–9 (40%) 96.2 -13.17 1984 1953 157.7 — — — — -8 — -15 67.0% +1.24 3–7 (30%) 8–4 (67%) 94.3 -1.58
23 1972 2106 158.7 — — — — +68 -51 +59 66.5% +1.41 15–7 (68%) 9–6 (60%) 102.7 -8.31 1985 1900 142.6 — — — — -7 -288 +63 61.9% +0.74 8–7 (53%) 12–5 (71%) 102.4 +0.02
24 1973 2139 165.9 — — — — +112 -17 +17 71.1% +1.70 15–13 (54%) 8–12 (40%) 96.6 -10.99 1986 1882 145.3 — — — — +12 — — 56.1% +0.37 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 100.5 -2.28
25 1974 2136 163.5 — — — — +103 +14 +14 68.8% +1.15 6–8 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 96.0 -9.26 1987 1900 145.8 — — — — +27 — — 64.3% +0.85 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 103.0 +0.37
26 1975 2003 147.3 — — — — +25 +90 +135 59.8% +0.83 5–9 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 89.5 -2.82 1988 1920 147.3 — — — — +7 — +50 71.4% +1.21 4–8 (33%) 12–3 (80%) 100.4 +2.17
27 1976 2128 162.5 — — — — +44 -45 +52 65.5% +1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 102.3 -7.85 1989 1846 116.8 — — — — -9 — — 52.2% -0.09 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +0.55
28 1977 2058 157.4 — — — — +113 -43 +129 64.5% +0.90 8–6 (57%) 6–5 (55%) 100.5 -6.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1978 2014 156.7 — — — — +89 -40 +109 57.0% +0.57 10–7 (59%) 1–5 (17%) 96.0 -3.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1979 1828 144.5 — — — — +54 +109 +234 46.6% -0.42 7–10 (41%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -3.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1980 1681 130.9 — — — — +19 — +233 40.4% -0.67 3–8 (27%) 3–8 (27%) 89.1 -2.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1981 1687 134.5 — — — — +87 +183 +144 46.8% +0.19 5–7 (42%) 0–4 (0%) 91.4 +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1982 1668 113.9 — — — — +43 — +125 39.3% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1983 1662 117.4 — — — — -25 — +150 44.9% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 1–0 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1984 1609 94.3 — — — — — — — 18.2% -2.82 1–0 — — +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1985 1574 92.4 — — — — +9 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1986 1548 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1988 1523 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1989 1500 89.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1990 1491 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1991 1476 94.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2214 159.5 — — — — +65 -31 +61 62.3% +0.97 134–120 (53%) 55–68 (45%) 91.0 -9.04 — 2099 155.7 — — — — +18 -226 -45 60.0% +0.67 66–75 (47%) 81–67 (55%) 98.1 -0.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.