H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC
Rosie Casals holds a 1–0 lead over Carole Loop in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rosie Casals leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Rosie Casals won the 1968 Boston round of 32 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosie Casals | 6-4 7-5 | Carole Loop | Match data | Feb 23, 1968* | R32 | Boston | WTA 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosie Casals | #207 | #6 | — | 2,212 | 594 | 322 | 64.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
| Carole Loop | — | — | — | 1,500 | 2 | 7 | 22.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Rosie Casals | Carole Loop | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 42–19 | 68.9% | — | 1,877 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 52–21 | 71.2% | — | 2,043 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1971 | 92–31 | 74.8% | — | 2,172 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1972 | 64–26 | 71.1% | — | 2,105 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1973 | 81–28 | 74.3% | — | 2,139 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | 43–16 | 72.9% | — | 2,140 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 2,004 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #6 | 2,127 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 2,054 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 24–15 | 61.5% | — | 2,011 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 19–26 | 42.2% | — | 1,826 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 14–25 | 35.9% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #172 | 1,608 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,546 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Rosie Casals | Carole Loop | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1968 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 18 | 8 | 26 | 69.2% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1968 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1969 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 22 | 7 | 29 | 75.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1969 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 1970 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 29 | 8 | 37 | 78.4% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1971 | 14 | 4 | 18 | 77.8% | 25 | 10 | 35 | 71.4% | 22 | 8 | 30 | 73.3% | 31 | 9 | 40 | 77.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1972 | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 24 | 8 | 32 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1973 | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% | 20 | 5 | 25 | 80.0% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 31 | 14 | 45 | 68.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 23 | 7 | 30 | 76.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 25 | 12 | 37 | 67.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 121 | 75 | 196 | 61.7% | 132 | 65 | 197 | 67.0% | 144 | 69 | 213 | 67.6% | 197 | 113 | 310 | 63.5% | Career | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Rosie Casals | Carole Loop | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1968 | 1751 | 130.0 | — | — | — | — | +41 | -201 | -25 | 68.8% | +1.61 | 7–9 (44%) | — | — | +0.46 | 1968 | 1447 | 92.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11.1% | -2.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.03 |
| 1969 | 1878 | 140.7 | — | — | — | — | -130 | -92 | +93 | 64.3% | +1.09 | 12–6 (67%) | — | — | -4.14 | 1969 | 1472 | 110.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +33 | 41.7% | -0.58 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.22 |
| 1970 | 2043 | 161.0 | — | — | — | — | -151 | +10 | +19 | 68.1% | +1.60 | 11–5 (69%) | 1–3 (25%) | 104.5 | -10.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1971 | 2173 | 168.5 | — | — | — | — | +114 | -75 | -19 | 71.2% | +1.62 | 18–13 (58%) | 6–9 (40%) | 96.2 | -13.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1972 | 2106 | 158.7 | — | — | — | — | +68 | -51 | +59 | 66.5% | +1.41 | 15–7 (68%) | 9–6 (60%) | 102.7 | -7.80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1973 | 2139 | 165.9 | — | — | — | — | +112 | -17 | +17 | 71.1% | +1.70 | 15–13 (54%) | 8–12 (40%) | 96.6 | -11.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | 2140 | 162.3 | — | — | — | — | +99 | +10 | +10 | 69.8% | +1.25 | 6–8 (43%) | 5–4 (56%) | 96.0 | -8.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 2004 | 147.2 | — | — | — | — | +23 | +89 | +133 | 59.8% | +0.83 | 5–9 (36%) | 3–4 (43%) | 89.5 | -3.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 2127 | 162.3 | — | — | — | — | +41 | -44 | +54 | 65.5% | +1.01 | 7–4 (64%) | 6–3 (67%) | 102.3 | -7.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 2055 | 157.2 | — | — | — | — | +115 | -41 | +133 | 64.5% | +0.90 | 8–6 (57%) | 6–5 (55%) | 100.5 | -6.67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 2011 | 156.1 | — | — | — | — | +88 | -37 | +114 | 57.0% | +0.57 | 10–7 (59%) | 1–5 (17%) | 95.9 | -4.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 1826 | 144.2 | — | — | — | — | +54 | +112 | +237 | 46.6% | -0.42 | 7–10 (41%) | 6–2 (75%) | 94.5 | -3.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 1678 | 130.2 | — | — | — | — | +17 | — | +237 | 40.4% | -0.67 | 3–8 (27%) | 3–8 (27%) | 89.2 | -1.94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 1685 | 134.1 | — | — | — | — | +86 | +184 | +145 | 46.0% | +0.16 | 5–6 (45%) | 0–4 (0%) | 92.6 | +0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 1666 | 113.8 | — | — | — | — | +42 | — | +126 | 39.3% | -0.75 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–2 | — | -0.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 1661 | 117.2 | — | — | — | — | -26 | — | +150 | 44.9% | -0.27 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–0 | — | -0.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 1608 | 94.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18.2% | -2.82 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 1573 | 92.4 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | — | 11.1% | -2.78 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 1547 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 1522 | 93.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.25 | — | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 1499 | 89.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 1491 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 1476 | 94.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2212 | 159.2 | — | — | — | — | +64 | -31 | +61 | 62.3% | +0.97 | 134–119 (53%) | 55–68 (45%) | 91.2 | -9.01 | Career | 1500 | 101.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +33 | 28.6% | -1.48 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | -2.78 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billie Jean King | 6 | 34 | 40 | Jun 26, 1983 | H2H |
| Francoise Durr | 20 | 14 | 34 | Jun 29, 1979 | H2H |
| Kerry Reid | 16 | 17 | 33 | Oct 13, 1979 | H2H |
| Margaret Court | 3 | 29 | 32 | Feb 20, 1977 | H2H |
| Virginia Wade | 13 | 14 | 27 | Feb 16, 1980 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephanie Defina | 0 | 1 | 1 | Nov 1, 1969 | H2H |
| Carole Graebner | 1 | 0 | 1 | Oct 31, 1969 | H2H |
| Margaret Court | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 4, 1969 | H2H |
| Simmy Stockman | 1 | 0 | 1 | Aug 3, 1969 | H2H |
| Kerry Harris | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 30, 1969 | H2H |