H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Rosie Casals vs Catherine Tanvier H2H: 0-1

Catherine Tanvier holds a 1–0 lead over Rosie Casals in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catherine Tanvier leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Catherine Tanvier won the 1982 Charleston Open round of 64 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosie Casals
USA Age 78 Right-Handed 159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Catherine Tanvier
FRA Age 61 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Catherine Tanvier 6-1 6-3 Rosie Casals Match data Apr 7, 1982* R64 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rosie Casals — #6 — 2,213 594 323 64.8% 0 0 0 3 9 12
Catherine Tanvier — #20 22 1,879 161 179 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosie Casals Catherine Tanvier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 4–2 66.7% — 1,545 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 6–14 30.0% — 1,540 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1982 23–19 54.8% — 1,801 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1983 17–16 51.5% — 1,827 0 0
19 1968 36–14 72.0% — 1,750 0 1 1984 21–18 53.8% #30 1,778 0 0
20 1969 42–19 68.9% — 1,877 0 1 1985 18–16 52.9% #39 1,775 0 0
21 1970 52–21 71.2% — 2,043 0 4 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,826 0 0
22 1971 92–31 74.8% — 2,172 0 7 1987 10–19 34.5% #96 1,619 0 0
23 1972 64–26 71.1% — 2,105 0 10 1988 9–16 36.0% #77 1,603 0 0
24 1973 81–28 74.3% — 2,139 0 12 1989 12–12 50.0% #65 1,674 0 0
25 1974 43–17 71.7% — 2,136 0 12 1990 9–11 45.0% #99 1,657 0 0
26 1975 20–14 58.8% — 2,002 0 12 1991 7–10 41.2% #104 1,603 0 0
27 1976 39–17 69.6% #6 2,127 0 12 1992 6–7 46.2% #105 1,614 0 0
28 1977 41–20 67.2% #6 2,057 0 12 1993 0–2 0.0% #543 1,578 0 0
29 1978 24–15 61.5% — 2,013 0 12 — — — — — — —
30 1979 19–26 42.2% — 1,828 0 12 — — — — — — —
31 1980 14–25 35.9% — 1,680 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 1981 12–14 46.2% — 1,687 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 1982 4–8 33.3% — 1,667 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 1983 9–12 42.9% — 1,661 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 1984 1–4 20.0% #172 1,609 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 1985 1–4 20.0% — 1,573 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,547 0 12 — — — — — — —
39 1988 0–2 0.0% — 1,523 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 1989 0–2 0.0% — 1,499 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 12 — — — — — — —
42 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rosie Casals Catherine Tanvier
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 4 11 63.6%
19 1968 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 8 26 69.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 1984 5 5 10 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
20 1969 4 4 8 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 1970 8 3 11 72.7% 29 8 37 78.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7%
22 1971 14 4 18 77.8% 25 10 35 71.4% 22 8 30 73.3% 31 9 40 77.5% 1987 2 4 6 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 1972 16 6 22 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 24 8 32 75.0% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1973 18 5 23 78.3% 20 5 25 80.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 31 14 45 68.9% 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1974 6 4 10 60.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 23 7 30 76.7% 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1975 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 1991 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
27 1976 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 12 37 67.6% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
28 1977 14 5 19 73.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 1 5 80.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1978 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 11 13 24 45.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1980 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 7 12 19 36.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1983 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 121 75 196 61.7% 132 65 197 67.0% 144 69 213 67.6% 197 113 310 63.5% — 40 45 85 47.1% 51 52 103 49.5% 28 32 60 46.7% 41 46 87 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rosie Casals Catherine Tanvier
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1546 111.1 — — — — — +25 — 57.1% +0.79 2–0 0–1 — +0.78
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1541 110.4 — — — — +70 +73 +7 34.9% -1.14 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — -0.05
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1801 146.0 — — — — -101 -57 -142 54.0% +0.40 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 106.1 -4.01
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1827 138.9 — — — — +19 -51 -192 52.0% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -1.11
19 1968 1751 130.0 — — — — +41 -201 -25 68.8% +1.61 7–9 (44%) — — +0.46 1984 1779 138.5 — — — — +11 +66 -120 52.4% +0.25 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 101.9 -0.73
20 1969 1878 140.7 — — — — -130 -92 +93 64.3% +1.09 12–6 (67%) — — -4.14 1985 1776 132.0 — — — — -9 +34 -112 54.3% +0.26 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.4 -0.50
21 1970 2043 161.0 — — — — -151 +10 +19 68.1% +1.60 11–5 (69%) 1–3 (25%) 104.5 -10.75 1986 1826 142.1 — — — — +18 -76 -150 47.6% -0.15 9–1 (90%) 4–3 (57%) 108.6 -1.62
22 1971 2173 168.5 — — — — +114 -75 -19 71.2% +1.62 18–13 (58%) 6–9 (40%) 96.2 -13.17 1987 1620 113.3 — — — — +55 +14 +54 38.8% -0.72 5–6 (45%) 1–7 (13%) 92.3 -0.21
23 1972 2106 158.7 — — — — +68 -51 +59 66.5% +1.41 15–7 (68%) 9–6 (60%) 102.7 -8.31 1988 1604 122.5 — — — — +8 +16 +40 40.7% -0.54 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — -0.94
24 1973 2139 165.9 — — — — +112 -17 +17 71.1% +1.70 15–13 (54%) 8–12 (40%) 96.6 -10.99 1989 1674 141.1 — — — — -10 -62 +28 50.9% +0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–0 — -0.88
25 1974 2136 163.5 — — — — +103 +14 +14 68.8% +1.15 6–8 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 96.0 -9.26 1990 1658 111.6 — — — — -1 -82 +74 45.0% -0.43 2–0 1–1 — +0.74
26 1975 2003 147.3 — — — — +25 +90 +135 59.8% +0.83 5–9 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 89.5 -2.82 1991 1604 113.4 — — — — +31 -74 — 40.5% -0.43 4–1 (80%) 0–3 (0%) 101.2 +0.59
27 1976 2128 162.5 — — — — +44 -45 +52 65.5% +1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 102.3 -7.85 1992 1614 106.2 — — — — +44 — — 42.9% -0.57 2–0 — — +1.48
28 1977 2058 157.4 — — — — +113 -43 +129 64.5% +0.90 8–6 (57%) 6–5 (55%) 100.5 -6.67 1993 1579 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.11
29 1978 2014 156.7 — — — — +89 -40 +109 57.0% +0.57 10–7 (59%) 1–5 (17%) 96.0 -3.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1979 1828 144.5 — — — — +54 +109 +234 46.6% -0.42 7–10 (41%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -3.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1980 1681 130.9 — — — — +19 — +233 40.4% -0.67 3–8 (27%) 3–8 (27%) 89.1 -2.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1981 1687 134.5 — — — — +87 +183 +144 46.8% +0.19 5–7 (42%) 0–4 (0%) 91.4 +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1982 1668 113.9 — — — — +43 — +125 39.3% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1983 1662 117.4 — — — — -25 — +150 44.9% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 1–0 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1984 1609 94.3 — — — — — — — 18.2% -2.82 1–0 — — +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1985 1574 92.4 — — — — +9 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1986 1548 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1988 1523 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1989 1500 89.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1990 1491 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1991 1476 94.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2214 159.5 — — — — +65 -31 +61 62.3% +0.97 134–120 (53%) 55–68 (45%) 91.0 -9.04 — 1880 137.1 — — — — +7 -13 -54 47.4% -0.16 49–31 (61%) 23–32 (42%) 105.2 -1.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.