H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Rosie Casals vs Ching Ling Chang H2H: 1-0
Rosie Casals holds a 1–0 lead over Ching Ling Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rosie Casals leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rosie Casals won the 1971 Los Angeles third round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 77
Right-Handed
159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 78
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 1971* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Rosie Casals | (w/o) | Ching Ling Chang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosie Casals | #207 | #55 | — | 2,203 | 594 | 322 | 64.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 12 |
| Ching Ling Chang | — | — | — | 1,500 | 13 | 41 | 24.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rosie Casals | Ching Ling Chang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1968 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1969 | 42–19 | 68.9% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1970 | 52–21 | 71.2% | — | 2,035 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1971 | 92–31 | 74.8% | — | 2,162 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1972 | 64–26 | 71.1% | — | 2,098 | 0 | 10 | 1971 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1973 | 81–28 | 74.3% | — | 2,122 | 0 | 12 | 1972 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1974 | 43–16 | 72.9% | — | 2,127 | 0 | 12 | 1973 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1975 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 12 | 1974 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1976 | 39–17 | 69.6% | — | 2,122 | 0 | 12 | 1975 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1977 | 41–20 | 67.2% | — | 2,044 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1978 | 24–15 | 61.5% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1979 | 19–26 | 42.2% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1980 | 14–25 | 35.9% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1981 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1982 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1983 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1984 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #172 | 1,610 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,548 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |