H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Rosie Casals vs Claudia Kohde Kilsch H2H: 0-1

Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 1–0 lead over Rosie Casals in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1982 Mahwah round of 64 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosie Casals
USA Age 77 Right-Handed 159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Claudia Kohde Kilsch
GER Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Claudia Kohde Kilsch 6-4 7-5 Rosie Casals Match data Aug 25, 1982* R64 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rosie Casals #207 #6 — 2,212 594 322 64.8% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,158 401 234 63.1% 0 0 0 3 9 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosie Casals Claudia Kohde Kilsch
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,754 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,838 0 5
18 — — — — — — — 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,909 0 8
19 1968 36–14 72.0% — 1,750 0 1 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8
20 1969 42–19 68.9% — 1,877 0 1 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,019 0 9
21 1970 52–21 71.2% — 2,043 0 4 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,117 0 10
22 1971 92–31 74.8% — 2,172 0 7 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,051 0 10
23 1972 64–26 71.1% — 2,105 0 10 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 2,019 0 10
24 1973 81–28 74.3% — 2,139 0 12 1988 39–19 67.2% #12 1,944 0 11
25 1974 43–16 72.9% — 2,140 0 12 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,852 0 11
26 1975 20–14 58.8% — 2,004 0 12 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,791 0 12
27 1976 39–17 69.6% #6 2,127 0 12 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,681 0 12
28 1977 41–20 67.2% #6 2,054 0 12 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,646 0 12
29 1978 24–15 61.5% — 2,011 0 12 — — — — — — —
30 1979 19–26 42.2% — 1,826 0 12 — — — — — — —
31 1980 14–25 35.9% — 1,677 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 1981 12–14 46.2% — 1,685 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 1982 4–8 33.3% — 1,666 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 1983 9–12 42.9% — 1,660 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 1984 1–4 20.0% #172 1,608 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 1985 1–4 20.0% — 1,573 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 1986 0–2 0.0% #207 1,546 0 12 — — — — — — —
39 1988 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 1989 0–2 0.0% — 1,499 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 12 — — — — — — —
42 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,475 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rosie Casals Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 23 11 34 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 15 6 21 71.4%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 8 3 11 72.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 9 19 52.6%
19 1968 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 8 26 69.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 5 6 11 45.5%
20 1969 4 4 8 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1984 11 4 15 73.3% 15 3 18 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 1970 8 3 11 72.7% 29 8 37 78.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1985 16 4 20 80.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 6 15 60.0%
22 1971 14 4 18 77.8% 25 10 35 71.4% 22 8 30 73.3% 31 9 40 77.5% 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 14 5 19 73.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 14 7 21 66.7%
23 1972 16 6 22 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 24 8 32 75.0% 1987 11 4 15 73.3% 14 6 20 70.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1973 18 5 23 78.3% 20 5 25 80.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 31 14 45 68.9% 1988 11 5 16 68.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 5 10 50.0%
25 1974 6 4 10 60.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 23 7 30 76.7% 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1975 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5%
27 1976 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 12 37 67.6% 1991 0 5 5 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
28 1977 14 5 19 73.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 1 5 80.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1992 5 3 8 62.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 1978 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 11 13 24 45.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1980 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 7 12 19 36.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1983 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 121 75 196 61.7% 132 65 197 67.0% 144 69 213 67.6% 197 113 310 63.5% — 79 44 123 64.2% 137 74 211 64.9% 94 47 141 66.7% 84 69 153 54.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rosie Casals Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1485 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1481 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1754 141.9 — — — — -177 +14 -96 63.0% +1.28 11–8 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 102.1 +2.19
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1839 144.2 — — — — -30 +101 -183 61.9% +0.82 9–6 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 108.3 +1.97
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1909 149.0 — — — — -39 -95 -105 56.3% +0.45 10–6 (63%) 9–5 (64%) 105.4 -3.56
19 1968 1751 130.0 — — — — +41 -201 -25 68.8% +1.61 7–9 (44%) — — +0.46 1983 1871 146.4 — — — — -37 -5 +26 57.3% +0.57 9–5 (64%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -2.04
20 1969 1878 140.7 — — — — -130 -92 +93 64.3% +1.09 12–6 (67%) — — -4.14 1984 2020 157.9 — — — — -105 +10 -19 68.9% +1.35 11–7 (61%) 7–2 (78%) 106.9 -0.85
21 1970 2043 161.0 — — — — -151 +10 +19 68.1% +1.60 11–5 (69%) 1–3 (25%) 104.5 -10.75 1985 2117 168.7 — — — — -41 -27 -48 67.3% +1.34 11–5 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 101.3 -5.33
22 1971 2173 168.5 — — — — +114 -75 -19 71.2% +1.62 18–13 (58%) 6–9 (40%) 96.2 -13.17 1986 2051 166.8 — — — — +5 +61 +33 69.2% +1.38 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) 94.1 -3.82
23 1972 2106 158.7 — — — — +68 -51 +59 66.5% +1.41 15–7 (68%) 9–6 (60%) 102.7 -7.80 1987 2019 157.7 — — — — +25 +60 +93 66.1% +1.25 7–2 (78%) 6–4 (60%) 105.5 -4.06
24 1973 2139 165.9 — — — — +112 -17 +17 71.1% +1.70 15–13 (54%) 8–12 (40%) 96.6 -11.01 1988 1944 157.8 — — — — +22 +69 +216 66.7% +1.34 6–6 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 95.8 -2.14
25 1974 2140 162.3 — — — — +99 +10 +10 69.8% +1.25 6–8 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 96.0 -8.65 1989 1852 145.0 — — — — +53 — +235 50.7% +0.23 8–3 (73%) 0–6 (0%) 94.9 -0.60
26 1975 2004 147.2 — — — — +23 +89 +133 59.8% +0.83 5–9 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 89.5 -3.22 1990 1791 135.8 — — — — +1 +129 +296 50.6% +0.34 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 95.8 -1.35
27 1976 2127 162.3 — — — — +41 -44 +54 65.5% +1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 102.3 -7.96 1991 1681 120.9 — — — — +20 +142 +305 46.8% -0.32 3–8 (27%) 6–2 (75%) 93.8 +0.54
28 1977 2055 157.2 — — — — +115 -41 +133 64.5% +0.90 8–6 (57%) 6–5 (55%) 100.5 -6.67 1992 1646 122.3 — — — — +44 +113 +331 42.9% -0.62 4–2 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.52
29 1978 2011 156.1 — — — — +88 -37 +114 57.0% +0.57 10–7 (59%) 1–5 (17%) 95.9 -4.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1979 1826 144.2 — — — — +54 +112 +237 46.6% -0.42 7–10 (41%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -3.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1980 1678 130.2 — — — — +17 — +237 40.4% -0.67 3–8 (27%) 3–8 (27%) 89.2 -1.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1981 1685 134.1 — — — — +86 +184 +145 46.0% +0.16 5–6 (45%) 0–4 (0%) 92.6 +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1982 1666 113.8 — — — — +42 — +126 39.3% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1983 1661 117.2 — — — — -26 — +150 44.9% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 1–0 — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1984 1608 94.3 — — — — — — — 18.2% -2.82 1–0 — — +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1985 1573 92.4 — — — — +8 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1986 1547 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1988 1522 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1989 1499 89.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1990 1491 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1991 1476 94.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2212 159.2 — — — — +64 -31 +61 62.3% +0.97 134–119 (53%) 55–68 (45%) 91.2 -9.01 — 2158 157.5 — — — — -16 +44 +48 60.8% +0.85 99–69 (59%) 57–57 (50%) 100.8 -3.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.