H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Rosie Casals vs Jo Durie H2H: 0-1

Jo Durie holds a 1–0 lead over Rosie Casals in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jo Durie leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1989 San Diego round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosie Casals
USA Age 78 Right-Handed 159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Jo Durie
GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jo Durie #91 6-4 6-2 Rosie Casals Match data Aug 3, 1989* R32 San Diego WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rosie Casals — #6 — 2,213 594 323 64.8% 0 0 0 3 9 12
Jo Durie — #5 31 2,102 311 263 54.2% 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosie Casals Jo Durie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,602 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1978 15–9 62.5% — 1,618 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3
19 1968 36–14 72.0% — 1,750 0 1 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,736 0 4
20 1969 42–19 68.9% — 1,877 0 1 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7
21 1970 52–21 71.2% — 2,043 0 4 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,842 0 7
22 1971 92–31 74.8% — 2,172 0 7 1983 47–18 72.3% #6 2,095 0 9
23 1972 64–26 71.1% — 2,105 0 10 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,891 0 9
24 1973 81–28 74.3% — 2,139 0 12 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,800 0 9
25 1974 43–17 71.7% — 2,136 0 12 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9
26 1975 20–14 58.8% — 2,002 0 12 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,742 0 9
27 1976 39–17 69.6% #6 2,127 0 12 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,703 0 9
28 1977 41–20 67.2% #6 2,057 0 12 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9
29 1978 24–15 61.5% — 2,013 0 12 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,673 0 9
30 1979 19–26 42.2% — 1,828 0 12 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,708 0 9
31 1980 14–25 35.9% — 1,680 0 12 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,688 0 9
32 1981 12–14 46.2% — 1,687 0 12 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,563 0 9
33 1982 4–8 33.3% — 1,667 0 12 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,555 0 9
34 1983 9–12 42.9% — 1,661 0 12 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,548 0 9
35 1984 1–4 20.0% #172 1,609 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 1985 1–4 20.0% — 1,573 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,547 0 12 — — — — — — —
39 1988 0–2 0.0% — 1,523 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 1989 0–2 0.0% — 1,499 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 12 — — — — — — —
42 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rosie Casals Jo Durie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1968 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 8 26 69.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 1980 — — — — 13 6 19 68.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0%
20 1969 4 4 8 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1970 8 3 11 72.7% 29 8 37 78.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9%
22 1971 14 4 18 77.8% 25 10 35 71.4% 22 8 30 73.3% 31 9 40 77.5% 1983 12 3 15 80.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
23 1972 16 6 22 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 24 8 32 75.0% 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 1973 18 5 23 78.3% 20 5 25 80.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 31 14 45 68.9% 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1974 6 4 10 60.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 23 7 30 76.7% 1986 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8%
26 1975 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 1976 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 12 37 67.6% 1988 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 1977 14 5 19 73.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 1 5 80.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1978 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 11 13 24 45.8% 1991 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
31 1980 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 7 12 19 36.8% 1992 3 7 10 30.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
32 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
34 1983 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 1995 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
35 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 121 75 196 61.7% 132 65 197 67.0% 144 69 213 67.6% 197 113 310 63.5% — 73 75 148 49.3% 57 45 102 55.9% 103 72 175 58.9% 50 65 115 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rosie Casals Jo Durie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1499 100.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.54
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1503 107.8 — — — — +73 — +95 54.2% +0.71 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +3.20
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1602 121.7 — — — — — -35 +42 56.1% +0.71 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.17
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1619 121.0 — — — — +14 — -9 57.4% +0.50 5–1 (83%) 1–2 (33%) 104.3 +3.05
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1713 129.5 — — — — — -74 -93 58.5% +0.36 6–1 (86%) 6–2 (75%) 110.0 +0.65
19 1968 1751 130.0 — — — — +41 -201 -25 68.8% +1.61 7–9 (44%) — — +0.46 1980 1736 123.2 — — — — -179 -11 -58 61.7% +0.60 5–8 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 99.6 +0.27
20 1969 1878 140.7 — — — — -130 -92 +93 64.3% +1.09 12–6 (67%) — — -4.14 1981 1861 136.4 — — — — -158 -78 -117 60.8% +0.60 12–2 (86%) 4–1 (80%) 113.5 -1.05
21 1970 2043 161.0 — — — — -151 +10 +19 68.1% +1.60 11–5 (69%) 1–3 (25%) 104.5 -10.75 1982 1843 141.3 — — — — -59 -76 -39 55.1% +0.21 8–9 (47%) 2–4 (33%) 97.4 -1.90
22 1971 2173 168.5 — — — — +114 -75 -19 71.2% +1.62 18–13 (58%) 6–9 (40%) 96.2 -13.17 1983 2096 160.0 — — — — -76 -185 -100 69.3% +1.31 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.6 -5.50
23 1972 2106 158.7 — — — — +68 -51 +59 66.5% +1.41 15–7 (68%) 9–6 (60%) 102.7 -8.31 1984 1892 136.4 — — — — +10 -61 +83 49.3% +0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 95.2 +0.35
24 1973 2139 165.9 — — — — +112 -17 +17 71.1% +1.70 15–13 (54%) 8–12 (40%) 96.6 -10.99 1985 1801 133.4 — — — — +15 -49 +121 48.8% +0.06 7–7 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.7 -1.39
25 1974 2136 163.5 — — — — +103 +14 +14 68.8% +1.15 6–8 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 96.0 -9.26 1986 1843 140.1 — — — — +2 -80 +45 55.7% +0.21 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 105.1 -2.77
26 1975 2003 147.3 — — — — +25 +90 +135 59.8% +0.83 5–9 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 89.5 -2.82 1987 1742 134.3 — — — — +30 -31 +107 41.0% -0.69 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.4 -2.49
27 1976 2128 162.5 — — — — +44 -45 +52 65.5% +1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 102.3 -7.85 1988 1703 127.8 — — — — 0 -16 +121 49.4% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 8–4 (67%) 101.9 -0.25
28 1977 2058 157.4 — — — — +113 -43 +129 64.5% +0.90 8–6 (57%) 6–5 (55%) 100.5 -6.67 1989 1622 126.1 — — — — -7 — +202 41.3% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.33
29 1978 2014 156.7 — — — — +89 -40 +109 57.0% +0.57 10–7 (59%) 1–5 (17%) 96.0 -3.72 1990 1674 130.7 — — — — -60 — +193 51.7% +0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +0.04
30 1979 1828 144.5 — — — — +54 +109 +234 46.6% -0.42 7–10 (41%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -3.07 1991 1709 132.3 — — — — +5 -111 +95 45.5% -0.12 6–7 (46%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 +1.02
31 1980 1681 130.9 — — — — +19 — +233 40.4% -0.67 3–8 (27%) 3–8 (27%) 89.1 -2.38 1992 1689 130.8 — — — — -48 -50 +163 50.0% -0.09 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 +0.39
32 1981 1687 134.5 — — — — +87 +183 +144 46.8% +0.19 5–7 (42%) 0–4 (0%) 91.4 +0.33 1993 1564 107.8 — — — — -12 — — 35.9% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 92.1 +1.33
33 1982 1668 113.9 — — — — +43 — +125 39.3% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — -0.54 1994 1555 106.0 — — — — — — +191 33.3% -1.42 0–2 — — -0.60
34 1983 1662 117.4 — — — — -25 — +150 44.9% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 1–0 — -0.33 1995 1549 107.6 — — — — — — +141 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–0 — -0.20
35 1984 1609 94.3 — — — — — — — 18.2% -2.82 1–0 — — +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1985 1574 92.4 — — — — +9 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1986 1548 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1988 1523 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1989 1500 89.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1990 1491 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1991 1476 94.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2214 159.5 — — — — +65 -31 +61 62.3% +0.97 134–120 (53%) 55–68 (45%) 91.0 -9.04 — 2102 141.8 — — — — -26 -68 +43 53.6% +0.27 97–90 (52%) 53–46 (54%) 102.6 -0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.