H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Rosie Casals vs Liz Smylie H2H: 0-1

Liz Smylie holds a 1–0 lead over Rosie Casals in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Liz Smylie leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Liz Smylie won the 1983 Newport round of 32 5-7 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosie Casals
USA Age 77 Right-Handed 159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Liz Smylie
AUS Age 63 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Liz Smylie 5-7 6-3 6-3 Rosie Casals Match data Jul 14, 1983* R32 Newport WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rosie Casals #207 #6 — 2,212 594 322 64.8% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Liz Smylie #501 #20 29 1,823 161 189 46.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosie Casals Liz Smylie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,630 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1981 2–10 16.7% — 1,515 0 1
19 1968 36–14 72.0% — 1,750 0 1 1982 15–8 65.2% — 1,628 0 3
20 1969 42–19 68.9% — 1,877 0 1 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,754 0 4
21 1970 52–21 71.2% — 2,043 0 4 1984 13–18 41.9% #36 1,765 0 4
22 1971 92–31 74.8% — 2,172 0 7 1985 16–19 45.7% #43 1,729 0 4
23 1972 64–26 71.1% — 2,105 0 10 1986 6–13 31.6% #114 1,668 0 4
24 1973 81–28 74.3% — 2,139 0 12 1987 20–14 58.8% #27 1,747 0 5
25 1974 43–16 72.9% — 2,140 0 12 1988 4–12 25.0% #153 1,607 0 5
26 1975 20–14 58.8% — 2,004 0 12 1989 21–22 48.8% #66 1,681 0 5
27 1976 39–17 69.6% #6 2,127 0 12 1990 15–16 48.4% #53 1,665 0 5
28 1977 41–20 67.2% #6 2,054 0 12 1991 9–16 36.0% #116 1,612 0 5
29 1978 24–15 61.5% — 2,011 0 12 1992 0–1 0.0% #209 1,599 0 5
30 1979 19–26 42.2% — 1,826 0 12 1993 7–15 31.8% #125 1,549 0 5
31 1980 14–25 35.9% — 1,677 0 12 1994 2–7 22.2% #192 1,515 0 5
32 1981 12–14 46.2% — 1,685 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 1982 4–8 33.3% — 1,666 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 1983 9–12 42.9% — 1,660 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 1984 1–4 20.0% #172 1,608 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 1985 1–4 20.0% — 1,573 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 1986 0–2 0.0% #207 1,546 0 12 — — — — — — —
39 1988 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 1989 0–2 0.0% — 1,499 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 12 — — — — — — —
42 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,475 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rosie Casals Liz Smylie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — — — — — 10 3 13 76.9% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
19 1968 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 8 26 69.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — —
20 1969 4 4 8 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1970 8 3 11 72.7% 29 8 37 78.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1971 14 4 18 77.8% 25 10 35 71.4% 22 8 30 73.3% 31 9 40 77.5% 1985 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 9 7 16 56.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1972 16 6 22 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 24 8 32 75.0% 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1973 18 5 23 78.3% 20 5 25 80.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 31 14 45 68.9% 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1974 6 4 10 60.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 23 7 30 76.7% 1988 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1975 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 1989 14 14 28 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1976 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 12 37 67.6% 1990 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 1977 14 5 19 73.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 1 5 80.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1991 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 1978 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 11 13 24 45.8% 1993 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
31 1980 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 7 12 19 36.8% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1983 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 121 75 196 61.7% 132 65 197 67.0% 144 69 213 67.6% 197 113 310 63.5% — 51 80 131 38.9% 11 19 30 36.7% 84 60 144 58.3% 13 29 42 31.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rosie Casals Liz Smylie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1630 113.8 — — — — — — +68 63.6% +0.73 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) 103.1 +1.27
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1516 99.0 — — — — +29 +16 +113 20.0% -1.68 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.93
19 1968 1751 130.0 — — — — +41 -201 -25 68.8% +1.61 7–9 (44%) — — +0.46 1982 1628 117.1 — — — — — +36 +61 59.3% +0.70 8–2 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 106.2 +1.87
20 1969 1878 140.7 — — — — -130 -92 +93 64.3% +1.09 12–6 (67%) — — -4.14 1983 1754 135.8 — — — — -168 -34 +79 54.4% +0.25 8–5 (62%) 3–3 (50%) 104.5 +2.10
21 1970 2043 161.0 — — — — -151 +10 +19 68.1% +1.60 11–5 (69%) 1–3 (25%) 104.5 -10.75 1984 1765 122.9 — — — — -245 -129 +140 45.6% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.5 -1.24
22 1971 2173 168.5 — — — — +114 -75 -19 71.2% +1.62 18–13 (58%) 6–9 (40%) 96.2 -13.17 1985 1730 128.1 — — — — -158 — +131 47.1% -0.38 7–8 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 -0.38
23 1972 2106 158.7 — — — — +68 -51 +59 66.5% +1.41 15–7 (68%) 9–6 (60%) 102.7 -7.80 1986 1669 119.0 — — — — -124 -109 +185 38.5% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 -0.61
24 1973 2139 165.9 — — — — +112 -17 +17 71.1% +1.70 15–13 (54%) 8–12 (40%) 96.6 -11.01 1987 1747 133.3 — — — — -128 — +164 57.7% +0.17 5–5 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.3 +0.13
25 1974 2140 162.3 — — — — +99 +10 +10 69.8% +1.25 6–8 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 96.0 -8.65 1988 1607 97.5 — — — — -90 — +200 25.7% -1.91 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 +1.27
26 1975 2004 147.2 — — — — +23 +89 +133 59.8% +0.83 5–9 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 89.5 -3.22 1989 1682 124.8 — — — — -34 -171 +107 47.1% -0.16 10–6 (63%) 5–7 (42%) 101.1 +1.75
27 1976 2127 162.3 — — — — +41 -44 +54 65.5% +1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 102.3 -7.96 1990 1665 124.3 — — — — +4 — +123 47.1% -0.23 7–3 (70%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +0.59
28 1977 2055 157.2 — — — — +115 -41 +133 64.5% +0.90 8–6 (57%) 6–5 (55%) 100.5 -6.67 1991 1613 115.0 — — — — -44 — +187 37.9% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 103.0 -0.32
29 1978 2011 156.1 — — — — +88 -37 +114 57.0% +0.57 10–7 (59%) 1–5 (17%) 95.9 -4.25 1992 1600 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01
30 1979 1826 144.2 — — — — +54 +112 +237 46.6% -0.42 7–10 (41%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -3.11 1993 1550 117.2 — — — — -36 — +259 37.0% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 0–2 — +0.46
31 1980 1678 130.2 — — — — +17 — +237 40.4% -0.67 3–8 (27%) 3–8 (27%) 89.2 -1.94 1994 1515 99.5 — — — — -31 — +232 31.6% -1.79 1–2 (33%) — — +0.11
32 1981 1685 134.1 — — — — +86 +184 +145 46.0% +0.16 5–6 (45%) 0–4 (0%) 92.6 +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1982 1666 113.8 — — — — +42 — +126 39.3% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1983 1661 117.2 — — — — -26 — +150 44.9% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 1–0 — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1984 1608 94.3 — — — — — — — 18.2% -2.82 1–0 — — +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1985 1573 92.4 — — — — +8 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1986 1547 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1988 1522 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1989 1499 89.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1990 1491 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1991 1476 94.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2212 159.2 — — — — +64 -31 +61 62.3% +0.97 134–119 (53%) 55–68 (45%) 91.2 -9.01 — 1824 127.3 — — — — -80 -43 +132 46.2% -0.37 67–54 (55%) 30–38 (44%) 100.0 +2.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.