H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Rosie Casals vs Nancy Richey H2H: 8-12
Nancy Richey holds a 12–8 lead over Rosie Casals in their WTA head-to-head. Across 20 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on carpet, while Nancy Richey leads 4–2 on clay. Most recently, Rosie Casals won the 1977 Houston third round 4-6 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 77
Right-Handed
159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
8
–
12
20 main draw meetings
USA
Age 83
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 1977* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Rosie Casals | 4-6 7-5 6-2 | Nancy Richey | Match data |
| Jan 12, 1976 | Houston | WTA 250 | BR | Hard | Rosie Casals | 8-7(3) | Nancy Richey | Match data |
| Sep 27, 1975* | Denver | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Nancy Richey | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Rosie Casals | Match data |
| Jan 26, 1974* | Mission Viejo | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Nancy Richey | 6-7(2) 6-2 6-1 | Rosie Casals | Match data |
| Jan 19, 1974* | San Francisco | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Nancy Richey | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Rosie Casals | Match data |
| Oct 7, 1973* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Nancy Richey | 5-7 7-6(4) 7-5 | Rosie Casals | Match data |
| May 7, 1973* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Rosie Casals | 3-6 6-1 7-5 | Nancy Richey | Match data |
| Jan 28, 1973* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | SF | Carpet | Nancy Richey | 6-2 0-6 6-3 | Rosie Casals | Match data |
| Jul 7, 1972* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Rosie Casals | 3-6 6-4 6-0 | Nancy Richey | Match data |
| May 8, 1972* | Indianapolis Indoors | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Nancy Richey | 6-2 6-2 | Rosie Casals | Match data |
| Mar 26, 1972* | Richmond | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Nancy Richey | 1-6 7-5 6-2 | Rosie Casals | Match data |
| Oct 3, 1971* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Rosie Casals | 6-3 6-2 | Nancy Richey | Match data |
| Aug 19, 1971 | Chicago | WTA 250 | BR | Clay | Nancy Richey | 3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | Rosie Casals | Match data |
| Jan 19, 1971* | Long Beach | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Rosie Casals | 6-3 6-1 | Nancy Richey | Match data |
| Jan 11, 1971* | San Francisco | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Rosie Casals | 6-4 7-6(1) | Nancy Richey | Match data |
| Nov 10, 1970* | Richmond | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Nancy Richey | 6-3 6-2 | Rosie Casals | Match data |
| Oct 4, 1970* | San Francisco | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Nancy Richey | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Rosie Casals | Match data |
| Jul 26, 1970* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | F | Clay | Rosie Casals | 6-3 6-3 | Nancy Richey | Match data |
| Sep 8, 1969* | US Open | Grand Slam | SF | Grass | Nancy Richey | 7-5 6-3 | Rosie Casals | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1968* | Buenos Aires | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Nancy Richey | 6-2 5-7 6-2 | Rosie Casals | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosie Casals | #207 | #55 | — | 2,203 | 594 | 322 | 64.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 12 |
| Nancy Richey | — | — | — | 2,236 | 324 | 109 | 74.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 24 | 28 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rosie Casals | Nancy Richey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1968 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1969 | 42–19 | 68.9% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1970 | 52–21 | 71.2% | — | 2,035 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1971 | 92–31 | 74.8% | — | 2,162 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1972 | 64–26 | 71.1% | — | 2,098 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1973 | 81–28 | 74.3% | — | 2,122 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1974 | 43–16 | 72.9% | — | 2,127 | 0 | 12 | 1968 | 56–5 | 91.8% | — | 1,887 | 1 | 10 |
| 26 | 1975 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 12 | 1969 | 33–8 | 80.5% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 13 |
| 27 | 1976 | 39–17 | 69.6% | — | 2,122 | 0 | 12 | 1970 | 43–8 | 84.3% | — | 2,114 | 1 | 20 |
| 28 | 1977 | 41–20 | 67.2% | — | 2,044 | 0 | 12 | 1971 | 29–13 | 69.0% | — | 2,078 | 1 | 20 |
| 29 | 1978 | 24–15 | 61.5% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 12 | 1972 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 2,128 | 1 | 25 |
| 30 | 1979 | 19–26 | 42.2% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 12 | 1973 | 34–13 | 72.3% | — | 2,162 | 1 | 25 |
| 31 | 1980 | 14–25 | 35.9% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 12 | 1974 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 25 |
| 32 | 1981 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 12 | 1975 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 26 |
| 33 | 1982 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 12 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 2,034 | 1 | 26 |
| 34 | 1983 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 12 | 1977 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,983 | 1 | 28 |
| 35 | 1984 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #172 | 1,610 | 0 | 12 | 1978 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,902 | 1 | 28 |
| 36 | 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,548 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |