H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Rosie Casals vs Nancy Richey H2H: 8-12

Nancy Richey holds a 12–8 lead over Rosie Casals in their WTA head-to-head. Across 20 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on carpet, while Nancy Richey leads 4–2 on clay. Most recently, Rosie Casals won the 1977 Houston round of 32 4-6 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosie Casals
USA Age 77 Right-Handed 159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
8 – 12
20 main-draw meetings
Nancy Richey
USA Age 84 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rosie Casals 4-6 7-5 6-2 Nancy Richey Match data Jan 20, 1977* R32 Houston WTA 250 Carpet
Rosie Casals 8-7(3) Nancy Richey Match data Jan 18, 1976* BR Houston WTA 250 Hard
Nancy Richey 7-6(4) 6-2 Rosie Casals Match data Sep 27, 1975* QF Denver WTA 250 Carpet
Nancy Richey 6-7(2) 6-2 6-1 Rosie Casals Match data Jan 26, 1974* QF Mission Viejo WTA 250 Hard
Nancy Richey 7-6(4) 6-4 Rosie Casals Match data Jan 19, 1974* QF San Francisco WTA 250 Hard
Nancy Richey 5-7 7-6(4) 7-5 Rosie Casals Match data Oct 7, 1973* SF Phoenix WTA 250 Hard
Rosie Casals 3-6 6-1 7-5 Nancy Richey Match data May 7, 1973* F Hilton Head WTA 250 Clay
Nancy Richey 6-2 0-6 6-3 Rosie Casals Match data Jan 28, 1973* SF Los Angeles WTA 500 Carpet
Rosie Casals 3-6 6-4 6-0 Nancy Richey Match data Jul 7, 1972* QF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Nancy Richey 6-2 6-2 Rosie Casals Match data May 8, 1972* SF Indianapolis Indoors WTA 250 Carpet
Nancy Richey 1-6 7-5 6-2 Rosie Casals Match data Mar 26, 1972* SF Richmond WTA 250 Clay
Rosie Casals 6-3 6-2 Nancy Richey Match data Oct 3, 1971* SF Phoenix WTA 250 Hard
Nancy Richey 3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 Rosie Casals Match data Aug 25, 1971* BR Chicago WTA 250 Clay
Rosie Casals 6-3 6-1 Nancy Richey Match data Jan 19, 1971* SF Long Beach WTA 250 Carpet
Rosie Casals 6-4 7-6(1) Nancy Richey Match data Jan 11, 1971* SF San Francisco WTA 250 Carpet
Nancy Richey 6-3 6-2 Rosie Casals Match data Nov 10, 1970* SF Richmond WTA 250 Clay
Nancy Richey 7-6(2) 6-4 Rosie Casals Match data Oct 4, 1970* F San Francisco WTA 250 Hard
Rosie Casals 6-3 6-3 Nancy Richey Match data Jul 26, 1970* F Cincinnati Open WTA 250 Clay
Nancy Richey 7-5 6-3 Rosie Casals Match data Sep 8, 1969* SF US Open Grand Slam Grass
Nancy Richey 6-2 5-7 6-2 Rosie Casals Match data Nov 9, 1968* SF Buenos Aires WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rosie Casals #207 #6 — 2,212 594 322 64.8% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Nancy Richey — #8 — 2,245 324 109 74.8% 1 0 0 2 19 22

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosie Casals Nancy Richey
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1968 36–14 72.0% — 1,750 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1969 42–19 68.9% — 1,877 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1970 52–21 71.2% — 2,043 0 4 — — — — — — —
22 1971 92–31 74.8% — 2,172 0 7 — — — — — — —
23 1972 64–26 71.1% — 2,105 0 10 — — — — — — —
24 1973 81–28 74.3% — 2,139 0 12 — — — — — — —
25 1974 43–16 72.9% — 2,140 0 12 1968 56–5 91.8% — 1,916 1 4
26 1975 20–14 58.8% — 2,004 0 12 1969 33–8 80.5% — 2,054 1 7
27 1976 39–17 69.6% #6 2,127 0 12 1970 43–8 84.3% — 2,122 1 14
28 1977 41–20 67.2% #6 2,054 0 12 1971 29–13 69.0% — 2,076 1 14
29 1978 24–15 61.5% — 2,011 0 12 1972 45–12 78.9% — 2,194 1 19
30 1979 19–26 42.2% — 1,826 0 12 1973 34–13 72.3% — 2,191 1 19
31 1980 14–25 35.9% — 1,677 0 12 1974 25–13 65.8% — 2,151 1 19
32 1981 12–14 46.2% — 1,685 0 12 1975 24–11 68.6% #8 2,120 1 20
33 1982 4–8 33.3% — 1,666 0 12 1976 14–10 58.3% — 2,084 1 20
34 1983 9–12 42.9% — 1,660 0 12 1977 15–7 68.2% — 2,016 1 22
35 1984 1–4 20.0% #172 1,608 0 12 1978 6–9 40.0% — 1,922 1 22
36 1985 1–4 20.0% — 1,573 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 1986 0–2 0.0% #207 1,546 0 12 — — — — — — —
39 1988 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 1989 0–2 0.0% — 1,499 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 12 — — — — — — —
42 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,475 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rosie Casals Nancy Richey
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1968 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 8 26 69.2% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1969 4 4 8 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1970 8 3 11 72.7% 29 8 37 78.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1971 14 4 18 77.8% 25 10 35 71.4% 22 8 30 73.3% 31 9 40 77.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1972 16 6 22 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 24 8 32 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1973 18 5 23 78.3% 20 5 25 80.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 31 14 45 68.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1974 6 4 10 60.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 23 7 30 76.7% 1968 5 1 6 83.3% 35 3 38 92.1% 9 1 10 90.0% 4 0 4 100.0%
26 1975 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 1969 15 4 19 78.9% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
27 1976 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 12 37 67.6% 1970 9 0 9 100.0% 26 5 31 83.9% 4 1 5 80.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
28 1977 14 5 19 73.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 1 5 80.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1971 8 4 12 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 8 5 13 61.5%
29 1978 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% 1972 11 1 12 91.7% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 13 3 16 81.3%
30 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 11 13 24 45.8% 1973 12 3 15 80.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
31 1980 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 7 12 19 36.8% 1974 12 7 19 63.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
32 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1975 11 3 14 78.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
33 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1976 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6%
34 1983 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
35 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5%
36 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 121 75 196 61.7% 132 65 197 67.0% 144 69 213 67.6% 197 113 310 63.5% — 87 29 116 75.0% 125 34 159 78.6% 38 11 49 77.6% 65 35 100 65.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rosie Casals Nancy Richey
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1968 1751 130.0 — — — — +41 -201 -25 68.8% +1.61 7–9 (44%) — — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1969 1878 140.7 — — — — -130 -92 +93 64.3% +1.09 12–6 (67%) — — -4.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1970 2043 161.0 — — — — -151 +10 +19 68.1% +1.60 11–5 (69%) 1–3 (25%) 104.5 -10.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1971 2173 168.5 — — — — +114 -75 -19 71.2% +1.62 18–13 (58%) 6–9 (40%) 96.2 -13.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1972 2106 158.7 — — — — +68 -51 +59 66.5% +1.41 15–7 (68%) 9–6 (60%) 102.7 -7.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1973 2139 165.9 — — — — +112 -17 +17 71.1% +1.70 15–13 (54%) 8–12 (40%) 96.6 -11.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1974 2140 162.3 — — — — +99 +10 +10 69.8% +1.25 6–8 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 96.0 -8.65 1968 1916 145.6 — — — — -119 +83 -174 87.6% +3.09 10–1 (91%) — — -0.10
26 1975 2004 147.2 — — — — +23 +89 +133 59.8% +0.83 5–9 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 89.5 -3.22 1969 2054 151.8 — — — — +32 -32 -127 77.3% +1.99 6–2 (75%) — — -3.41
27 1976 2127 162.3 — — — — +41 -44 +54 65.5% +1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 102.3 -7.96 1970 2123 162.9 — — — — +60 -35 -127 80.0% +2.51 6–2 (75%) 1–0 — -4.02
28 1977 2055 157.2 — — — — +115 -41 +133 64.5% +0.90 8–6 (57%) 6–5 (55%) 100.5 -6.67 1971 2077 156.0 — — — — +22 +31 -94 65.1% +1.50 4–4 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 97.6 -3.59
29 1978 2011 156.1 — — — — +88 -37 +114 57.0% +0.57 10–7 (59%) 1–5 (17%) 95.9 -4.25 1972 2194 166.6 — — — — +186 -41 -224 79.6% +2.43 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 101.6 -6.67
30 1979 1826 144.2 — — — — +54 +112 +237 46.6% -0.42 7–10 (41%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -3.11 1973 2192 164.0 — — — — +123 -6 -220 67.6% +1.24 9–7 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 101.3 -7.33
31 1980 1678 130.2 — — — — +17 — +237 40.4% -0.67 3–8 (27%) 3–8 (27%) 89.2 -1.94 1974 2152 156.5 — — — — +112 +19 -165 68.9% +1.60 7–3 (70%) 3–3 (50%) 99.8 -3.90
32 1981 1685 134.1 — — — — +86 +184 +145 46.0% +0.16 5–6 (45%) 0–4 (0%) 92.6 +0.30 1975 2121 155.3 — — — — +105 -19 — 65.8% +1.55 8–4 (67%) 2–6 (25%) 96.2 -2.17
33 1982 1666 113.8 — — — — +42 — +126 39.3% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — -0.59 1976 2085 155.1 — — — — +132 -40 — 60.0% +0.82 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 -4.18
34 1983 1661 117.2 — — — — -26 — +150 44.9% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 1–0 — -0.27 1977 2016 146.8 — — — — +91 +43 — 64.6% +1.42 3–3 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 96.9 -1.27
35 1984 1608 94.3 — — — — — — — 18.2% -2.82 1–0 — — +0.56 1978 1923 136.5 — — — — +56 +55 — 45.5% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 95.2 -2.03
36 1985 1573 92.4 — — — — +8 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1986 1547 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1988 1522 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1989 1499 89.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1990 1491 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1991 1476 94.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2212 159.2 — — — — +64 -31 +61 62.3% +0.97 134–119 (53%) 55–68 (45%) 91.2 -9.01 — 2245 164.5 — — — — +89 +9 -154 72.7% +1.89 62–37 (63%) 26–26 (50%) 100.3 -9.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.