H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Rosie Casals vs Pam Teeguarden H2H: 14-2
Rosie Casals holds a 14–2 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 16 main-draw meetings, Rosie Casals leads 5–0 on clay and 4–1 on grass. Most recently, Pam Teeguarden won the 1980 Carlsbad fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 77
Right-Handed
159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
14
–
2
16 main draw meetings
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 1980* | Carlsbad | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Pam Teeguarden | 6-3 6-4 | Rosie Casals | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1979* | Chichester | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Pam Teeguarden | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | Rosie Casals | Match data |
| Oct 21, 1977* | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Rosie Casals | 7-6 7-5 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1977* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Rosie Casals | 6-3 7-6 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Nov 14, 1975* | London | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Rosie Casals | 6-3 6-2 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1974* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Rosie Casals | 6-2 9-8 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Feb 27, 1973* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Rosie Casals | 6-2 6-2 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Sep 16, 1972* | Charlotte | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Rosie Casals | 6-7 6-1 6-2 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Aug 5, 1972* | Columbus | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Rosie Casals | 6-1 6-3 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1972* | Tucson | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Rosie Casals | 6-0 6-3 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Jan 16, 1972* | San Francisco | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Rosie Casals | 6-2 6-4 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Sep 18, 1971* | Louisville | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Rosie Casals | 6-2 6-3 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Aug 28, 1971* | Newport | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Rosie Casals | 6-1 6-4 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| May 21, 1971* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Rosie Casals | 6-0 6-0 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Sep 10, 1970* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Rosie Casals | 7-5 6-4 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Aug 28, 1970* | South Orange | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Rosie Casals | 6-1 6-4 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosie Casals | #207 | #55 | — | 2,203 | 594 | 322 | 64.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 12 |
| Pam Teeguarden | — | — | — | 1,926 | 245 | 296 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rosie Casals | Pam Teeguarden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1968 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 19–19 | 50.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1969 | 42–19 | 68.9% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1970 | 52–21 | 71.2% | — | 2,035 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 31–25 | 55.4% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1971 | 92–31 | 74.8% | — | 2,162 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 21–22 | 48.8% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1972 | 64–26 | 71.1% | — | 2,098 | 0 | 10 | 1974 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,905 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1973 | 81–28 | 74.3% | — | 2,122 | 0 | 12 | 1975 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1974 | 43–16 | 72.9% | — | 2,127 | 0 | 12 | 1976 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1975 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 12 | 1977 | 14–20 | 41.2% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1976 | 39–17 | 69.6% | — | 2,122 | 0 | 12 | 1978 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1977 | 41–20 | 67.2% | — | 2,044 | 0 | 12 | 1979 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1978 | 24–15 | 61.5% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 12 | 1980 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1979 | 19–26 | 42.2% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 12 | 1981 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1980 | 14–25 | 35.9% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 12 | 1982 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1981 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 12 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 1982 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 12 | 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 1983 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 12 | 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 1984 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #172 | 1,610 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,548 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |