H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Rosie Casals vs Sue Barker H2H: 3-4

Sue Barker holds a 4–3 lead over Rosie Casals in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Sue Barker leads 2–1 on carpet, while Rosie Casals leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sue Barker won the 1980 Sydney International round of 32 7-5 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosie Casals
USA Age 78 Right-Handed 159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main-draw meetings
Sue Barker
GBR Age 70 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sue Barker 7-5 7-6 Rosie Casals Match data Dec 4, 1980* R32 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Sue Barker 6-3 Rosie Casals Match data Mar 11, 1979* BR Philadelphia WTA 250 Hard
Rosie Casals 6-4 3-6 6-4 Sue Barker Match data Jan 28, 1978* QF Los Angeles WTA 500 Hard
Rosie Casals 8-3 Sue Barker Match data Mar 20, 1977* BR Philadelphia WTA 250 Hard
Sue Barker 6-2 6-2 Rosie Casals Match data Mar 5, 1977* SF San Francisco WTA 250 Carpet
Sue Barker 6-3 2-6 7-6 Rosie Casals Match data Jan 29, 1977* SF Minneapolis WTA 250 Carpet
Rosie Casals 7-5 6-4 Sue Barker Match data Apr 12, 1976 RR WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rosie Casals — #6 — 2,213 594 323 64.8% 0 0 0 3 9 12
Sue Barker — #5 — 2,267 381 218 63.6% 1 0 0 3 18 22

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosie Casals Sue Barker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1970 1–1 50.0% — 1,513 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,526 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1972 3–2 60.0% — 1,542 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1973 8–6 57.1% — 1,569 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1974 40–20 66.7% — 1,764 0 6
19 1968 36–14 72.0% — 1,750 0 1 1975 50–19 72.5% — 1,969 0 11
20 1969 42–19 68.9% — 1,877 0 1 1976 64–24 72.7% #10 2,066 1 14
21 1970 52–21 71.2% — 2,043 0 4 1977 51–18 73.9% #5 2,147 1 16
22 1971 92–31 74.8% — 2,172 0 7 1978 16–14 53.3% — 1,939 1 17
23 1972 64–26 71.1% — 2,105 0 10 1979 54–24 69.2% #10 2,023 1 20
24 1973 81–28 74.3% — 2,139 0 12 1980 34–18 65.4% — 1,933 1 20
25 1974 43–17 71.7% — 2,136 0 12 1981 28–18 60.9% — 1,960 1 21
26 1975 20–14 58.8% — 2,002 0 12 1982 11–19 36.7% — 1,805 1 21
27 1976 39–17 69.6% #6 2,127 0 12 1983 18–20 47.4% — 1,751 1 22
28 1977 41–20 67.2% #6 2,057 0 12 1984 2–14 12.5% — 1,556 1 22
29 1978 24–15 61.5% — 2,013 0 12 — — — — — — —
30 1979 19–26 42.2% — 1,828 0 12 — — — — — — —
31 1980 14–25 35.9% — 1,680 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 1981 12–14 46.2% — 1,687 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 1982 4–8 33.3% — 1,667 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 1983 9–12 42.9% — 1,661 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 1984 1–4 20.0% #172 1,609 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 1985 1–4 20.0% — 1,573 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,547 0 12 — — — — — — —
39 1988 0–2 0.0% — 1,523 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 1989 0–2 0.0% — 1,499 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 12 — — — — — — —
42 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rosie Casals Sue Barker
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 19 9 28 67.9% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 1968 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 8 26 69.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 18 6 24 75.0% 21 6 27 77.8% 7 4 11 63.6%
20 1969 4 4 8 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1976 2 2 4 50.0% 25 5 30 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 21 11 32 65.6%
21 1970 8 3 11 72.7% 29 8 37 78.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1977 5 6 11 45.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 14 5 19 73.7% 30 6 36 83.3%
22 1971 14 4 18 77.8% 25 10 35 71.4% 22 8 30 73.3% 31 9 40 77.5% 1978 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9%
23 1972 16 6 22 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 24 8 32 75.0% 1979 12 6 18 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 15 10 25 60.0%
24 1973 18 5 23 78.3% 20 5 25 80.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 31 14 45 68.9% 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 14 8 22 63.6%
25 1974 6 4 10 60.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 23 7 30 76.7% 1981 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 9 6 15 60.0%
26 1975 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3%
27 1976 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 12 37 67.6% 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 6 9 33.3%
28 1977 14 5 19 73.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 1 5 80.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1978 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 11 13 24 45.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1980 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 7 12 19 36.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1983 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 121 75 196 61.7% 132 65 197 67.0% 144 69 213 67.6% 197 113 310 63.5% — 42 39 81 51.9% 70 36 106 66.0% 133 64 197 67.5% 113 75 188 60.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rosie Casals Sue Barker
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1514 108.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.03
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1526 105.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.11
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1542 113.2 — — — — — — +27 63.6% +1.00 0–1 1–0 — +1.43
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1569 110.1 — — — — — -23 -31 58.6% +0.65 0–3 (0%) — — +1.91
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1765 135.9 — — — — -151 -87 -20 63.0% +1.02 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 105.3 +3.57
19 1968 1751 130.0 — — — — +41 -201 -25 68.8% +1.61 7–9 (44%) — — +0.46 1975 1970 154.9 — — — — -139 -87 -17 71.3% +1.42 7–4 (64%) 7–1 (88%) 107.6 -2.83
20 1969 1878 140.7 — — — — -130 -92 +93 64.3% +1.09 12–6 (67%) — — -4.14 1976 2066 161.7 — — — — -35 -14 -14 67.5% +1.28 17–7 (71%) 6–7 (46%) 109.5 -5.34
21 1970 2043 161.0 — — — — -151 +10 +19 68.1% +1.60 11–5 (69%) 1–3 (25%) 104.5 -10.75 1977 2147 167.3 — — — — +152 -97 -84 72.9% +1.56 10–4 (71%) 11–3 (79%) 108.3 -7.84
22 1971 2173 168.5 — — — — +114 -75 -19 71.2% +1.62 18–13 (58%) 6–9 (40%) 96.2 -13.17 1978 1939 142.4 — — — — +44 — +80 57.6% +0.97 1–4 (20%) 3–7 (30%) 90.7 -0.92
23 1972 2106 158.7 — — — — +68 -51 +59 66.5% +1.41 15–7 (68%) 9–6 (60%) 102.7 -8.31 1979 2024 162.7 — — — — +45 -16 +21 66.7% +1.18 9–12 (43%) 8–5 (62%) 93.0 -4.16
24 1973 2139 165.9 — — — — +112 -17 +17 71.1% +1.70 15–13 (54%) 8–12 (40%) 96.6 -10.99 1980 1933 146.3 — — — — +32 — +99 63.8% +1.04 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 96.5 -0.03
25 1974 2136 163.5 — — — — +103 +14 +14 68.8% +1.15 6–8 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 96.0 -9.26 1981 1960 149.6 — — — — +22 -1 +63 57.1% +0.36 14–8 (64%) 10–2 (83%) 109.0 -3.75
26 1975 2003 147.3 — — — — +25 +90 +135 59.8% +0.83 5–9 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 89.5 -2.82 1982 1806 134.4 — — — — +61 +88 +84 37.7% -0.84 5–4 (56%) 0–1 — -3.24
27 1976 2128 162.5 — — — — +44 -45 +52 65.5% +1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 102.3 -7.85 1983 1752 133.0 — — — — +75 +55 +124 48.9% -0.30 5–7 (42%) 7–2 (78%) 99.3 +0.23
28 1977 2058 157.4 — — — — +113 -43 +129 64.5% +0.90 8–6 (57%) 6–5 (55%) 100.5 -6.67 1984 1556 94.2 — — — — +108 +139 +247 12.5% -2.37 2–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.88
29 1978 2014 156.7 — — — — +89 -40 +109 57.0% +0.57 10–7 (59%) 1–5 (17%) 96.0 -3.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1979 1828 144.5 — — — — +54 +109 +234 46.6% -0.42 7–10 (41%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -3.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1980 1681 130.9 — — — — +19 — +233 40.4% -0.67 3–8 (27%) 3–8 (27%) 89.1 -2.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1981 1687 134.5 — — — — +87 +183 +144 46.8% +0.19 5–7 (42%) 0–4 (0%) 91.4 +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1982 1668 113.9 — — — — +43 — +125 39.3% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1983 1662 117.4 — — — — -25 — +150 44.9% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 1–0 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1984 1609 94.3 — — — — — — — 18.2% -2.82 1–0 — — +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1985 1574 92.4 — — — — +9 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1986 1548 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1988 1523 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1989 1500 89.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1990 1491 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1991 1476 94.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2214 159.5 — — — — +65 -31 +61 62.3% +0.97 134–120 (53%) 55–68 (45%) 91.0 -9.04 — 2268 155.9 — — — — +36 -26 +22 61.7% +0.84 83–64 (56%) 63–38 (62%) 106.4 -3.37

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.