H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Rosie Casals vs Winnie Shaw H2H: 3-2

Rosie Casals holds a 3–2 lead over Winnie Shaw in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Rosie Casals leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Rosie Casals won the 1971 Fulham fourth round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosie Casals
USA Age 77 Right-Handed 159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Winnie Shaw

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 14, 1971* Fulham WTA 250 R16 Clay Rosie Casals 6-2 6-3 Winnie Shaw Match data
Jul 3, 1970* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Rosie Casals 6-2 6-0 Winnie Shaw Match data
Sep 27, 1969* Los Angeles WTA 500 QF Hard Winnie Shaw 6-4 7-5 Rosie Casals Match data
Jun 20, 1968* Queen's Club WTA 250 R32 Grass Winnie Shaw 3-6 10-8 6-2 Rosie Casals Match data
Feb 25, 1968* Boston WTA 250 QF Carpet Rosie Casals 6-4 4-6 6-4 Winnie Shaw Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rosie Casals #207 #55 — 2,203 594 322 64.8% 0 1 0 2 9 12
Winnie Shaw — — — 1,991 296 144 67.3% 0 1 0 1 12 14

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosie Casals Winnie Shaw
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1968 36–14 72.0% — 1,760 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1969 42–19 68.9% — 1,874 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1970 52–21 71.2% — 2,035 0 4 1968 49–28 63.6% — 1,787 0 1
22 1971 92–31 74.8% — 2,162 0 7 1969 69–27 71.9% — 1,907 0 3
23 1972 64–26 71.1% — 2,098 0 10 1970 55–26 67.9% — 1,941 0 6
24 1973 81–28 74.3% — 2,122 0 12 1971 46–26 63.9% — 1,855 0 7
25 1974 43–16 72.9% — 2,127 0 12 1972 32–12 72.7% — 1,858 0 11
26 1975 20–14 58.8% — 1,995 0 12 1973 2–2 50.0% — 1,828 0 12
27 1976 39–17 69.6% — 2,122 0 12 1974 5–3 62.5% — 1,821 0 12
28 1977 41–20 67.2% — 2,044 0 12 1975 10–6 62.5% — 1,795 0 12
29 1978 24–15 61.5% — 2,019 0 12 1976 4–5 44.4% — 1,735 0 12
30 1979 19–26 42.2% — 1,824 0 12 1977 8–2 80.0% — 1,796 0 14
31 1980 14–25 35.9% — 1,676 0 12 1978 12–5 70.6% — 1,784 0 14
32 1981 12–14 46.2% — 1,692 0 12 1979 4–2 66.7% — 1,761 0 14
33 1982 4–8 33.3% — 1,670 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 1983 9–12 42.9% — 1,662 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 1984 1–4 20.0% #172 1,610 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 1985 1–4 20.0% — 1,574 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 1986 0–2 0.0% #207 1,548 0 12 — — — — — — —
39 1988 0–2 0.0% — 1,523 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 1989 0–2 0.0% — 1,500 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 12 — — — — — — —
42 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 12 — — — — — — —