H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Rossana De Los Ríos vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 1-1
Rossana De Los Ríos and Amanda Coetzer are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rossana De Los Ríos leads 1–0 on clay, while Amanda Coetzer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 2002 Australian Open second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PAR
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
158 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2002* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 6-3 6-1 | Rossana De Los Ríos | Match data |
| Jun 4, 2000* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Rossana De Los Ríos | 7-5 6-7(4) 6-4 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rossana De Los Ríos | #1,178 | #51 | 788 | 1,616 | 62 | 119 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Amanda Coetzer | #289 | #3 | 3,380 | 2,051 | 491 | 307 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rossana De Los Ríos | Amanda Coetzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #63 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #17 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #15 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #18 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2001 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 60–25 | 70.6% | #4 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #88 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,887 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #11 | 1,815 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,738 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #286 | 1,718 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #178 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |