H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Rossana De Los Ríos vs Angelica Gavaldon H2H: 0-1

Angelica Gavaldon holds a 1–0 lead over Rossana De Los Ríos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Angelica Gavaldon leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Angelica Gavaldon won the 1993 Manhattan Beach round of 64 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rossana De Los Ríos
PAR Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Angelica Gavaldon
MEX Age 52 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Angelica Gavaldon #59 6-1 6-0 Rossana De Los Ríos #94 Match data Aug 11, 1993* R64 Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rossana De Los Ríos #1,178 #51 788 1,622 64 120 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Angelica Gavaldon #434 #34 237 1,735 75 111 40.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Angelica Gavaldon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1988 1–3 25.0% #264 1,499 0 0
15 1991 0–1 0.0% #268 1,488 0 0 1989 2–4 33.3% #191 1,501 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1990 16–16 50.0% #51 1,601 0 0
17 1993 5–8 38.5% #118 1,538 0 0 1991 1–6 14.3% #242 1,556 0 0
18 1994 0–3 0.0% #462 1,504 0 0 1992 5–10 33.3% #142 1,577 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1993 19–20 48.7% #64 1,613 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1994 9–16 36.0% #119 1,605 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1995 17–17 50.0% #36 1,677 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1996 3–11 21.4% #219 1,593 0 0
23 1999 0–1 0.0% #270 1,488 0 0 1997 1–5 16.7% #107 1,527 0 0
24 2000 5–5 50.0% #76 1,523 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #697 1,521 0 0
25 2001 19–24 44.2% #54 1,601 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #379 1,515 0 0
26 2002 14–23 37.8% #88 1,553 0 0 2000 1–1 50.0% #261 1,526 0 0
27 2003 3–15 16.7% #149 1,449 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2004 1–2 33.3% #200 1,454 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2006 0–1 0.0% #205 1,448 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2007 0–3 0.0% #125 1,425 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2008 7–14 33.3% #95 1,437 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2009 6–9 40.0% #98 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2010 4–11 26.7% #178 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Angelica Gavaldon
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
15 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 13 10 23 56.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
17 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 12 11 23 52.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 7 9 16 43.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 10 13 23 43.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 1 5 6 16.7% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 30 53 83 36.1% 30 56 86 34.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — 55 71 126 43.7% 13 21 34 38.2% 5 9 14 35.7% 2 10 12 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Angelica Gavaldon
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1500 105.9 — — — — +36 — — 33.3% -1.44 0–1 0–1 — +0.09
15 1991 1489 100.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 1989 1501 104.0 — — — — +24 — — 35.7% -1.14 1–1 1–0 — +0.22
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1601 123.4 — — — — +41 -70 -31 48.0% -0.39 7–4 (64%) 2–2 (50%) 105.8 +1.11
17 1993 1539 109.1 — — — — +11 +17 — 33.3% -1.78 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.4 -0.33 1991 1557 107.9 — — — — +21 — — 23.5% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.31
18 1994 1504 96.2 — — — — +9 — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.04 1992 1578 119.9 — — — — -6 -9 — 29.0% -1.29 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.47
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1613 127.0 — — — — +4 -19 -41 49.4% -0.03 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 99.4 +0.85
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1605 119.4 — — — — +7 -4 — 35.3% -0.88 3–0 (100%) 1–6 (14%) 100.2 -0.02
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1678 132.9 — — — — 0 -76 -137 48.6% -0.23 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.9 +0.35
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1593 116.6 — — — — +13 — — 25.8% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 96.1 -0.12
23 1999 1489 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.09 1997 1528 94.3 — — — — +25 +52 — 28.6% -1.79 0–2 — — +0.66
24 2000 1523 109.6 — — — — -29 +54 — 45.0% -0.35 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.82 1998 1522 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.13
25 2001 1601 120.5 — — — — -70 +48 — 43.3% -0.41 7–4 (64%) 5–0 (100%) 110.0 +0.59 1999 1515 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.20
26 2002 1553 110.4 — — — — -15 +16 -14 42.2% -0.71 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 96.8 +0.94 2000 1526 104.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 — — +0.09
27 2003 1450 99.1 -2.66 -3.40 0.402 31.8% +43 +9 — 21.1% -2.08 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1454 110.2 — — — — +37 — — 42.9% -0.29 0–1 0–2 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1449 103.5 +0.91 +3.64 0.841 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1426 98.2 -0.36 -2.28 0.811 45.3% — — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1437 92.1 -4.65 -1.78 0.798 44.9% +40 -8 — 33.3% -1.78 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 100.2 +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1502 103.8 -3.71 -3.39 0.743 43.6% -10 -46 — 37.1% -1.34 4–1 (80%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2010 1480 107.1 -3.00 -0.28 0.835 46.1% +10 -51 — 31.3% -1.63 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1623 110.4 -3.60 -1.81 0.772 44.3% -16 +7 -14 36.1% -1.15 18–26 (41%) 21–16 (57%) 101.5 +0.90 — 1735 127.2 — — — — +13 -28 -69 41.0% -0.69 25–21 (54%) 14–21 (40%) 101.4 +1.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.