H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Rossana De Los Ríos vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 0-1

Chanda Rubin holds a 1–0 lead over Rossana De Los Ríos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2002 Madrid Open round of 32 6-2 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rossana De Los Ríos
PAR Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chanda Rubin #65 6-2 7-6(5) Rossana De Los Ríos #59 Match data May 23, 2002* R32 Madrid Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rossana De Los Ríos #1,178 #51 788 1,622 64 120 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,042 345 232 59.8% 0 0 0 3 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Chanda Rubin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0
15 1991 0–1 0.0% #268 1,488 0 0 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,616 0 0
17 1993 5–8 38.5% #118 1,538 0 0 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0
18 1994 0–3 0.0% #462 1,504 0 0 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,934 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,985 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,813 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,799 0 1
23 1999 0–1 0.0% #270 1,488 0 0 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,839 0 2
24 2000 5–5 50.0% #76 1,523 0 0 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,940 0 3
25 2001 19–24 44.2% #54 1,601 0 0 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,816 0 3
26 2002 14–23 37.8% #88 1,553 0 0 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,962 0 5
27 2003 3–15 16.7% #149 1,449 0 0 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7
28 2004 1–2 33.3% #200 1,454 0 0 2004 18–11 62.1% #52 1,858 0 7
29 — — — — — — — 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,820 0 7
30 2006 0–1 0.0% #205 1,448 0 0 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,718 0 7
31 2007 0–3 0.0% #125 1,425 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2008 7–14 33.3% #95 1,437 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2009 6–9 40.0% #98 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2010 4–11 26.7% #178 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Chanda Rubin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
17 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 8 10 18 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 6 10 16 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
23 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 24 12 36 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 2001 10 13 23 43.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
26 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2002 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
27 2003 1 5 6 16.7% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 27 15 42 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 30 53 83 36.1% 30 56 86 34.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — 201 135 336 59.8% 66 47 113 58.4% 36 23 59 61.0% 42 27 69 60.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 46/73 of Rossana De Los Ríos's and 22/100 of Chanda Rubin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Chanda Rubin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 2003 2/18 0.0 3.0 64.5% 39.9% 37.3% 44.4% 0.0% 38.7% 24.6% 2003 9/63 2.6 3.1 60.3% 59.5% 50.1% 50.9% 48.1% 56.0% 48.6%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 7/29 1.0 2.9 63.3% 64.2% 47.5% 49.3% 53.5% 58.1% 48.4%
30 2006 1/1 2.0 1.0 70.1% 61.7% 25.0% 61.5% 66.7% 50.7% 41.4% 2006 6/8 0.2 1.2 69.5% 55.1% 44.9% 36.1% 40.3% 51.5% 33.4%
31 2007 1/3 0.0 1.0 79.0% 53.1% 35.3% 30.0% 62.5% 49.4% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 15/21 0.3 3.5 65.7% 52.5% 39.4% 54.9% 40.9% 48.3% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 14/15 0.3 3.7 63.5% 54.2% 40.3% 51.9% 41.5% 48.5% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2010 13/15 0.4 2.5 73.2% 54.7% 37.1% 50.7% 44.5% 49.7% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 46/184 0.3 3.2 67.5% 53.3% 38.5% 51.9% 41.4% 48.4% 39.8% — 22/577 1.4 2.5 63.8% 59.8% 47.9% 46.4% 47.7% 55.4% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Chanda Rubin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1489 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06
15 1991 1489 100.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 1991 1584 123.6 — — — — +18 — — 56.3% +0.37 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.85
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1617 121.6 — — — — +45 -100 — 40.7% -0.90 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.5 +0.28
17 1993 1539 109.1 — — — — +11 +17 — 33.3% -1.78 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.4 -0.33 1993 1653 130.3 — — — — -45 -47 +2 46.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 1–1 — -0.24
18 1994 1504 96.2 — — — — +9 — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.04 1994 1804 148.9 — — — — +16 -107 — 58.4% +0.56 10–5 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 111.5 -1.24
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1934 157.2 — — — — -22 -151 -210 64.6% +1.22 10–10 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 103.9 +0.03
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1986 164.3 — — — — +40 — — 60.9% +0.84 9–1 (90%) 2–3 (40%) 106.7 -1.38
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1814 153.7 — — — — +40 +33 — 53.2% +0.21 6–4 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 -2.41
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1800 144.1 — — — — +21 +15 -63 49.4% +0.27 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) 100.7 -0.79
23 1999 1489 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.09 1999 1839 156.4 — — — — +47 -68 — 62.2% +0.81 5–10 (33%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 -2.46
24 2000 1523 109.6 — — — — -29 +54 — 45.0% -0.35 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.82 2000 1941 157.5 — — — — +8 -111 -226 61.4% +0.66 14–9 (61%) 3–5 (38%) 100.4 -2.47
25 2001 1601 120.5 — — — — -70 +48 — 43.3% -0.41 7–4 (64%) 5–0 (100%) 110.0 +0.59 2001 1816 133.7 — — — — +33 -63 -24 52.2% +0.17 5–4 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -0.54
26 2002 1553 110.4 — — — — -15 +16 -14 42.2% -0.71 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 96.8 +0.94 2002 1962 162.2 — — — — -46 -101 +11 68.5% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 -3.02
27 2003 1450 99.1 -2.66 -3.40 0.402 31.8% +43 +9 — 21.1% -2.08 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.26 2003 1918 157.5 +1.04 +3.08 1.104 51.9% -9 +11 +142 62.9% +0.85 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 -0.62
28 2004 1454 110.2 — — — — +37 — — 42.9% -0.29 0–1 0–2 — +0.33 2004 1858 136.0 +2.06 +2.08 1.157 53.1% +22 — — 58.7% +0.65 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 96.4 +0.02
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1821 106.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.30
30 2006 1449 103.5 +0.91 +3.64 0.841 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.16 2006 1719 114.3 -0.94 -3.06 0.688 42.2% +24 — — 12.5% -2.75 — — — -0.69
31 2007 1426 98.2 -0.36 -2.28 0.811 45.3% — — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1437 92.1 -4.65 -1.78 0.798 44.9% +40 -8 — 33.3% -1.78 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 100.2 +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1502 103.8 -3.71 -3.39 0.743 43.6% -10 -46 — 37.1% -1.34 4–1 (80%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2010 1480 107.1 -3.00 -0.28 0.835 46.1% +10 -51 — 31.3% -1.63 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1623 110.4 -3.60 -1.81 0.772 44.3% -16 +7 -14 36.1% -1.15 18–26 (41%) 21–16 (57%) 101.5 +0.90 — 2043 157.5 +0.82 +1.09 0.996 49.6% +13 -69 -49 57.4% +0.52 103–69 (60%) 62–47 (57%) 110.6 -2.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.