H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Rossana De Los Ríos vs Daja Bedanova H2H: 0-1
Daja Bedanova holds a 1–0 lead over Rossana De Los Ríos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daja Bedanova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daja Bedanova won the 2001 Miami first round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PAR
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 43
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2001* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Daja Bedanova | 6-4 6-4 | Rossana De Los Ríos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rossana De Los Ríos | #1,178 | #51 | 788 | 1,616 | 62 | 119 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daja Bedanova | #998 | #16 | 1,323 | 1,801 | 64 | 71 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rossana De Los Ríos | Daja Bedanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #295 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #28 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #37 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #155 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #295 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2001 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #88 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #178 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |