H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Rossana De Los Ríos vs Florencia Labat H2H: 0-1
Florencia Labat holds a 1–0 lead over Rossana De Los Ríos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Florencia Labat leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Florencia Labat won the 1994 Brisbane second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PAR
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 55
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 1994* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Florencia Labat | 6-2 6-1 | Rossana De Los Ríos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rossana De Los Ríos | #1,178 | #51 | 788 | 1,616 | 62 | 119 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Florencia Labat | #106 | #26 | 733 | 1,875 | 190 | 181 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rossana De Los Ríos | Florencia Labat | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #42 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #88 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #39 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #106 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #178 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |