H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Rossana De Los Ríos vs Janet Lee H2H: 0-1
Janet Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Rossana De Los Ríos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Janet Lee leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Janet Lee won the 2002 Miami first round 6-3 2-6 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PAR
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 49
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2002* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Janet Lee | 6-3 2-6 7-6(1) | Rossana De Los Ríos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rossana De Los Ríos | #1,178 | #51 | 788 | 1,616 | 62 | 119 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Janet Lee | #863 | #79 | 390 | 1,560 | 31 | 67 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rossana De Los Ríos | Janet Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #547 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #270 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #169 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #86 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #217 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #88 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #162 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #694 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #178 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |