H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Rossana De Los Ríos vs Janet Lee H2H: 0-1

Janet Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Rossana De Los Ríos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Janet Lee leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Janet Lee won the 2002 Miami Open round of 128 6-3 2-6 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rossana De Los Ríos
PAR Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Janet Lee
TPE Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Janet Lee #108 6-3 2-6 7-6(1) Rossana De Los Ríos #55 Match data Mar 19, 2002* R128 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rossana De Los Ríos #1,178 #51 788 1,622 64 120 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Janet Lee #863 #79 390 1,570 31 67 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Janet Lee
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 0–1 0.0% #268 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #547 1,491 0 0
17 1993 5–8 38.5% #118 1,538 0 0 1994 1–2 33.3% #270 1,508 0 0
18 1994 0–3 0.0% #462 1,504 0 0 1995 4–7 36.4% #169 1,519 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 0–2 0.0% #175 1,513 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1997 3–4 42.9% #114 1,525 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1998 4–14 22.2% #86 1,498 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1999 5–10 33.3% #95 1,487 0 0
23 1999 0–1 0.0% #270 1,488 0 0 2000 5–8 38.5% #117 1,514 0 0
24 2000 5–5 50.0% #76 1,523 0 0 2001 7–9 43.8% #111 1,555 0 0
25 2001 19–24 44.2% #54 1,601 0 0 2002 1–6 14.3% #217 1,524 0 0
26 2002 14–23 37.8% #88 1,553 0 0 2003 1–3 25.0% #162 1,511 0 0
27 2003 3–15 16.7% #149 1,449 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2004 1–2 33.3% #200 1,454 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #694 1,495 0 0
30 2006 0–1 0.0% #205 1,448 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2007 0–3 0.0% #125 1,425 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2008 7–14 33.3% #95 1,437 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2009 6–9 40.0% #98 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2010 4–11 26.7% #178 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Janet Lee
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 3 10 13 23.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2001 10 13 23 43.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2003 1 5 6 16.7% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 30 53 83 36.1% 30 56 86 34.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — 26 46 72 36.1% 1 11 12 8.3% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Janet Lee
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1991 1489 100.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1492 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.01
17 1993 1539 109.1 — — — — +11 +17 — 33.3% -1.78 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.4 -0.33 1994 1508 115.6 — — — — +41 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–0 — — -0.45
18 1994 1504 96.2 — — — — +9 — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.04 1995 1519 101.0 — — — — +57 +14 — 28.6% -2.14 1–0 3–0 (100%) — -0.04
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1514 120.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.48
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1526 105.6 — — — — +53 — — 37.5% -1.13 2–0 0–1 — +0.41
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1499 121.5 — — — — +38 — — 30.0% -1.10 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 92.7 -0.18
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1488 111.5 — — — — +57 -62 — 38.2% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.61
23 1999 1489 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.09 2000 1515 113.7 — — — — +33 — — 43.3% -0.40 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.34
24 2000 1523 109.6 — — — — -29 +54 — 45.0% -0.35 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.82 2001 1556 116.3 — — — — +6 — — 47.2% +0.08 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — +0.01
25 2001 1601 120.5 — — — — -70 +48 — 43.3% -0.41 7–4 (64%) 5–0 (100%) 110.0 +0.59 2002 1525 103.5 — — — — +30 — — 13.3% -2.93 1–0 1–1 — -0.90
26 2002 1553 110.4 — — — — -15 +16 -14 42.2% -0.71 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 96.8 +0.94 2003 1512 102.1 -0.98 -0.78 0.826 45.5% — — +13 33.3% -0.45 0–1 0–1 — +0.01
27 2003 1450 99.1 -2.66 -3.40 0.402 31.8% +43 +9 — 21.1% -2.08 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1454 110.2 — — — — +37 — — 42.9% -0.29 0–1 0–2 — +0.33 2005 1496 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09
30 2006 1449 103.5 +0.91 +3.64 0.841 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1426 98.2 -0.36 -2.28 0.811 45.3% — — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1437 92.1 -4.65 -1.78 0.798 44.9% +40 -8 — 33.3% -1.78 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 100.2 +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1502 103.8 -3.71 -3.39 0.743 43.6% -10 -46 — 37.1% -1.34 4–1 (80%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2010 1480 107.1 -3.00 -0.28 0.835 46.1% +10 -51 — 31.3% -1.63 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1623 110.4 -3.60 -1.81 0.772 44.3% -16 +7 -14 36.1% -1.15 18–26 (41%) 21–16 (57%) 101.5 +0.90 — 1571 119.1 -0.98 -0.78 0.826 45.5% +36 -24 +13 34.3% -1.01 10–16 (38%) 7–12 (37%) 93.8 -0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.