H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Rossana De Los Ríos vs Laura Granville H2H: 1-0
Rossana De Los Ríos holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Granville in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rossana De Los Ríos leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rossana De Los Ríos won the 2002 Indian Wells first round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PAR
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2002* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Rossana De Los Ríos | 6-4 6-0 | Laura Granville | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rossana De Los Ríos | #1,178 | #51 | 788 | 1,616 | 62 | 119 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laura Granville | #466 | #28 | 1,063 | 1,722 | 86 | 108 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rossana De Los Ríos | Laura Granville | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1993 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #841 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #49 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #74 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #88 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #61 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #178 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |