H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Rossana De Los Ríos vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 1-0
Rossana De Los Ríos holds a 1–0 lead over Lilia Osterloh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rossana De Los Ríos leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rossana De Los Ríos won the 2008 Fes third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PAR
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2008* | Fes | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Rossana De Los Ríos | 6-4 6-4 | Lilia Osterloh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rossana De Los Ríos | #1,178 | #51 | 788 | 1,616 | 62 | 119 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lilia Osterloh | #1,223 | #41 | 738 | 1,697 | 83 | 138 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rossana De Los Ríos | Lilia Osterloh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1993 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #79 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #43 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #156 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #88 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #119 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #144 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #118 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #91 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #230 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #237 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #178 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |