H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Rossana De Los Ríos vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 0-1

Lori Mcneil holds a 1–0 lead over Rossana De Los Ríos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1993 Oakland round of 16 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rossana De Los Ríos
PAR Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lori Mcneil #27 6-4 6-1 Rossana De Los Ríos #121 Match data Nov 5, 1993* R16 Oakland Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rossana De Los Ríos #1,178 #51 788 1,622 64 120 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 0–1 0.0% #268 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1993 5–8 38.5% #118 1,538 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1994 0–3 0.0% #462 1,504 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1999 0–1 0.0% #270 1,488 0 0 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3
24 2000 5–5 50.0% #76 1,523 0 0 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5
25 2001 19–24 44.2% #54 1,601 0 0 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 2002 14–23 37.8% #88 1,553 0 0 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6
27 2003 3–15 16.7% #149 1,449 0 0 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 2004 1–2 33.3% #200 1,454 0 0 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 2006 0–1 0.0% #205 1,448 0 0 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 2007 0–3 0.0% #125 1,425 0 0 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 2008 7–14 33.3% #95 1,437 0 0 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11
33 2009 6–9 40.0% #98 1,501 0 0 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11
34 2010 4–11 26.7% #178 1,480 0 0 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,670 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Lori Mcneil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1%
23 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4%
24 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 2001 10 13 23 43.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
26 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 2003 1 5 6 16.7% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6%
31 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
32 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 30 53 83 36.1% 30 56 86 34.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Lori Mcneil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1991 1489 100.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17
17 1993 1539 109.1 — — — — +11 +17 — 33.3% -1.78 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.4 -0.33 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24
18 1994 1504 96.2 — — — — +9 — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.04 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1569 107.1 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1608 115.2 — — — — +12 -54 +10 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.27
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1587 118.3 — — — — +22 -103 +5 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.20
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1884 144.9 — — — — -9 -341 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.49
23 1999 1489 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.09 1987 2007 158.4 — — — — +54 -355 -205 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.78
24 2000 1523 109.6 — — — — -29 +54 — 45.0% -0.35 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.82 1988 1901 142.6 — — — — +37 -185 +39 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +2.06
25 2001 1601 120.5 — — — — -70 +48 — 43.3% -0.41 7–4 (64%) 5–0 (100%) 110.0 +0.59 1989 1760 134.7 — — — — +60 -78 +79 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.23
26 2002 1553 110.4 — — — — -15 +16 -14 42.2% -0.71 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 96.8 +0.94 1990 1695 134.9 — — — — +14 -74 +200 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80
27 2003 1450 99.1 -2.66 -3.40 0.402 31.8% +43 +9 — 21.1% -2.08 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.26 1991 1870 151.0 — — — — +12 -241 +42 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74
28 2004 1454 110.2 — — — — +37 — — 42.9% -0.29 0–1 0–2 — +0.33 1992 1962 156.8 — — — — -4 -303 +76 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38
30 2006 1449 103.5 +0.91 +3.64 0.841 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.16 1994 1871 145.9 — — — — -58 -207 +244 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52
31 2007 1426 98.2 -0.36 -2.28 0.811 45.3% — — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.20 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26
32 2008 1437 92.1 -4.65 -1.78 0.798 44.9% +40 -8 — 33.3% -1.78 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 100.2 +0.31 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +384 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48
33 2009 1502 103.8 -3.71 -3.39 0.743 43.6% -10 -46 — 37.1% -1.34 4–1 (80%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.17 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12
34 2010 1480 107.1 -3.00 -0.28 0.835 46.1% +10 -51 — 31.3% -1.63 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.27 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +315 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 1623 110.4 -3.60 -1.81 0.772 44.3% -16 +7 -14 36.1% -1.15 18–26 (41%) 21–16 (57%) 101.5 +0.90 — 2025 149.2 — — — — +14 -212 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.