H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Rossana De Los Ríos vs Magdalena Maleeva H2H: 0-2
Magdalena Maleeva holds a 2–0 lead over Rossana De Los Ríos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Maleeva leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 2003 Doha third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PAR
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 51
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2003* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Magdalena Maleeva | 6-2 6-1 | Rossana De Los Ríos | Match data |
| Aug 4, 1993* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Magdalena Maleeva | 6-1 6-0 | Rossana De Los Ríos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rossana De Los Ríos | #1,178 | #51 | 788 | 1,616 | 62 | 119 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Magdalena Maleeva | #401 | #4 | 1,834 | 2,083 | 384 | 272 | 58.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rossana De Los Ríos | Magdalena Maleeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #216 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #72 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #11 | 1,980 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 37–12 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #19 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #76 | 1,737 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2001 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #88 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #25 | 1,710 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #178 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |