H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Rossana De Los Ríos vs Marlene Weingartner H2H: 1-1

Rossana De Los Ríos and Marlene Weingartner are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Marlene Weingartner won the 2002 Sarasota round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rossana De Los Ríos
PAR Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Marlene Weingartner
GER Age 46 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marlene Weingartner #46 6-3 6-2 Rossana De Los Ríos #58 Match data Apr 4, 2002* R32 Sarasota Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Rossana De Los Ríos #151 6-0 6-1 Marlene Weingartner #103 Match data Jun 1, 2000* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rossana De Los Ríos #1,178 #51 788 1,622 64 120 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marlene Weingartner #1,051 #36 808 1,679 84 134 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Marlene Weingartner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 0–1 0.0% #268 1,488 0 0 1995 1–4 20.0% #231 1,480 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #211 1,471 0 0
17 1993 5–8 38.5% #118 1,538 0 0 1997 3–7 30.0% #127 1,467 0 0
18 1994 0–3 0.0% #462 1,504 0 0 1998 4–4 50.0% #104 1,510 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1999 7–14 33.3% #92 1,532 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2000 6–15 28.6% #87 1,493 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2001 21–26 44.7% #42 1,545 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2002 9–20 31.0% #97 1,482 0 0
23 1999 0–1 0.0% #270 1,488 0 0 2003 17–15 53.1% #47 1,645 0 0
24 2000 5–5 50.0% #76 1,523 0 0 2004 13–17 43.3% #71 1,630 0 0
25 2001 19–24 44.2% #54 1,601 0 0 2005 3–11 21.4% #381 1,509 0 0
26 2002 14–23 37.8% #88 1,553 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2003 3–15 16.7% #149 1,449 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2004 1–2 33.3% #200 1,454 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2006 0–1 0.0% #205 1,448 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2007 0–3 0.0% #125 1,425 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2008 7–14 33.3% #95 1,437 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2009 6–9 40.0% #98 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2010 4–11 26.7% #178 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Marlene Weingartner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 3 5 8 37.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 13 17 30 43.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 12 7 19 63.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 8 12 20 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2001 10 13 23 43.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 1 5 6 16.7% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 30 53 83 36.1% 30 56 86 34.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — 48 67 115 41.7% 26 43 69 37.7% 7 15 22 31.8% 3 9 12 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Marlene Weingartner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1991 1489 100.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 1995 1481 101.2 — — — — — +75 — 27.3% -1.82 0–1 0–1 — +0.10
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1471 99.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — 0.00
17 1993 1539 109.1 — — — — +11 +17 — 33.3% -1.78 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.4 -0.33 1997 1467 106.7 — — — — +25 +97 — 34.8% -1.48 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.51
18 1994 1504 96.2 — — — — +9 — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.04 1998 1511 116.1 — — — — +6 +47 — 50.0% -0.06 2–0 0–2 — +0.31
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1533 112.0 — — — — +6 +11 — 34.8% -1.74 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — -0.40
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1493 99.2 — — — — -1 +8 — 28.3% -1.70 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.9 +0.79
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1546 121.6 — — — — -18 +20 +50 45.5% -0.49 8–8 (50%) 9–2 (82%) 106.9 +0.06
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1483 114.9 — — — — +47 +8 +62 35.5% -1.16 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 +0.40
23 1999 1489 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.09 2003 1646 127.8 -1.25 -1.46 0.767 44.3% +19 -99 -81 48.5% -0.44 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.8 -0.63
24 2000 1523 109.6 — — — — -29 +54 — 45.0% -0.35 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.82 2004 1631 114.1 -1.58 +1.70 0.953 48.5% -17 -24 — 43.1% -0.66 5–2 (71%) 1–3 (25%) 102.5 -0.71
25 2001 1601 120.5 — — — — -70 +48 — 43.3% -0.41 7–4 (64%) 5–0 (100%) 110.0 +0.59 2005 1510 107.7 -1.33 -2.67 0.796 45.2% +66 +24 — 31.3% -1.25 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.5 -0.27
26 2002 1553 110.4 — — — — -15 +16 -14 42.2% -0.71 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 96.8 +0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 1450 99.1 -2.66 -3.40 0.402 31.8% +43 +9 — 21.1% -2.08 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1454 110.2 — — — — +37 — — 42.9% -0.29 0–1 0–2 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1449 103.5 +0.91 +3.64 0.841 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1426 98.2 -0.36 -2.28 0.811 45.3% — — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1437 92.1 -4.65 -1.78 0.798 44.9% +40 -8 — 33.3% -1.78 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 100.2 +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1502 103.8 -3.71 -3.39 0.743 43.6% -10 -46 — 37.1% -1.34 4–1 (80%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2010 1480 107.1 -3.00 -0.28 0.835 46.1% +10 -51 — 31.3% -1.63 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1623 110.4 -3.60 -1.81 0.772 44.3% -16 +7 -14 36.1% -1.15 18–26 (41%) 21–16 (57%) 101.5 +0.90 — 1679 119.1 -1.40 -0.52 0.849 46.2% +9 +7 +7 39.8% -0.95 33–27 (55%) 17–21 (45%) 106.9 +0.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.