H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Rossana De Los Ríos vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 0-1

Nicole Pratt holds a 1–0 lead over Rossana De Los Ríos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Pratt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Pratt won the 2001 Shanghai round of 16 3-6 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rossana De Los Ríos
PAR Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Pratt #65 3-6 6-4 6-3 Rossana De Los Ríos #58 Match data Oct 12, 2001* R16 Shanghai Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rossana De Los Ríos #1,178 #51 788 1,622 64 120 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 0–1 0.0% #268 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 5–8 38.5% #118 1,538 0 0 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 1994 0–3 0.0% #462 1,504 0 0 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 1999 0–1 0.0% #270 1,488 0 0 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0
24 2000 5–5 50.0% #76 1,523 0 0 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2001 19–24 44.2% #54 1,601 0 0 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 2002 14–23 37.8% #88 1,553 0 0 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 2003 3–15 16.7% #149 1,449 0 0 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0
28 2004 1–2 33.3% #200 1,454 0 0 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 2006 0–1 0.0% #205 1,448 0 0 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 2007 0–3 0.0% #125 1,425 0 0 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1
32 2008 7–14 33.3% #95 1,437 0 0 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1
33 2009 6–9 40.0% #98 1,501 0 0 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1
34 2010 4–11 26.7% #178 1,480 0 0 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Nicole Pratt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2001 10 13 23 43.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2003 1 5 6 16.7% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
34 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 30 53 83 36.1% 30 56 86 34.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 46/73 of Rossana De Los Ríos's and 48/157 of Nicole Pratt's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Nicole Pratt
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 2003 2/18 0.0 3.0 64.5% 39.9% 37.3% 44.4% 0.0% 38.7% 24.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1/1 2.0 1.0 70.1% 61.7% 25.0% 61.5% 66.7% 50.7% 41.4% 2003 5/40 0.2 4.4 66.1% 58.7% 43.7% 50.3% 59.6% 53.4% 44.9%
31 2007 1/3 0.0 1.0 79.0% 53.1% 35.3% 30.0% 62.5% 49.4% 41.0% 2004 6/43 0.2 4.2 65.0% 59.4% 44.8% 55.7% 43.2% 54.1% 41.6%
32 2008 15/21 0.3 3.5 65.7% 52.5% 39.4% 54.9% 40.9% 48.3% 41.3% 2005 5/25 0.8 5.2 59.5% 65.7% 44.6% 56.6% 40.1% 57.3% 44.7%
33 2009 14/15 0.3 3.7 63.5% 54.2% 40.3% 51.9% 41.5% 48.5% 38.3% 2006 8/20 0.5 2.1 70.5% 55.5% 41.2% 46.6% 36.4% 51.0% 39.9%
34 2010 13/15 0.4 2.5 73.2% 54.7% 37.1% 50.7% 44.5% 49.7% 42.0% 2007 21/26 1.0 2.3 68.4% 57.3% 43.1% 36.6% 53.8% 53.1% 41.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 3/3 0.0 2.7 71.0% 48.8% 32.7% 31.1% 30.0% 44.7% 35.8%
Career — 46/184 0.3 3.2 67.5% 53.3% 38.5% 51.9% 41.4% 48.4% 39.8% — 48/378 0.6 3.1 67.3% 57.8% 42.6% 43.8% 47.3% 52.8% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Nicole Pratt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1991 1489 100.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 1539 109.1 — — — — +11 +17 — 33.3% -1.78 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.4 -0.33 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59
18 1994 1504 96.2 — — — — +9 — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.04 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06
23 1999 1489 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.09 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
24 2000 1523 109.6 — — — — -29 +54 — 45.0% -0.35 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.82 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88
25 2001 1601 120.5 — — — — -70 +48 — 43.3% -0.41 7–4 (64%) 5–0 (100%) 110.0 +0.59 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10
26 2002 1553 110.4 — — — — -15 +16 -14 42.2% -0.71 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 96.8 +0.94 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11
27 2003 1450 99.1 -2.66 -3.40 0.402 31.8% +43 +9 — 21.1% -2.08 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.26 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98
28 2004 1454 110.2 — — — — +37 — — 42.9% -0.29 0–1 0–2 — +0.33 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86
30 2006 1449 103.5 +0.91 +3.64 0.841 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.16 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96
31 2007 1426 98.2 -0.36 -2.28 0.811 45.3% — — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.20 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14
32 2008 1437 92.1 -4.65 -1.78 0.798 44.9% +40 -8 — 33.3% -1.78 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 100.2 +0.31 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66
33 2009 1502 103.8 -3.71 -3.39 0.743 43.6% -10 -46 — 37.1% -1.34 4–1 (80%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.17 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71
34 2010 1480 107.1 -3.00 -0.28 0.835 46.1% +10 -51 — 31.3% -1.63 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.27 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45
Career — 1623 110.4 -3.60 -1.81 0.772 44.3% -16 +7 -14 36.1% -1.15 18–26 (41%) 21–16 (57%) 101.5 +0.90 — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.