H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Rossana De Los Ríos vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 1-2

Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 2–1 lead over Rossana De Los Ríos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2002 Pattaya third round 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rossana De Los Ríos
PAR Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 7, 2002* Pattaya WTA 250 R32 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #30 7-5 6-1 Rossana De Los Ríos #78 Match data
Sep 27, 2002* Bali WTA 250 R16 Hard Rossana De Los Ríos #89 2-6 6-4 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #27 Match data
Jun 28, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Tamarine Tanasugarn #40 7-5 6-2 Rossana De Los Ríos #84 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rossana De Los Ríos #1,178 #51 788 1,616 62 119 34.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 0–1 0.0% #268 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 1993 5–8 38.5% #118 1,538 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0
18 1994 0–3 0.0% #462 1,503 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0
23 1999 0–1 0.0% #270 1,488 0 0 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0
24 2000 3–4 42.9% #76 1,501 0 0 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0
25 2001 19–24 44.2% #54 1,597 0 0 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2002 14–23 37.8% #88 1,552 0 0 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2003 3–15 16.7% #149 1,449 0 0 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 2004 1–2 33.3% #200 1,454 0 0 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1
30 2006 0–1 0.0% #205 1,448 0 0 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1
31 2007 0–3 0.0% #125 1,425 0 0 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2
32 2008 7–14 33.3% #95 1,437 0 0 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 2009 6–9 40.0% #98 1,502 0 0 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 2010 4–11 26.7% #178 1,480 0 0 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4