H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie vs Elena Makarova H2H: 2-0
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie holds a 2–0 lead over Elena Makarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie won the 1997 Indian Wells third round 6-2 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 53
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 53
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 1997* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | Elena Makarova | Match data |
| Aug 18, 1993* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 7-6 6-2 | Elena Makarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | — | — | — | 1,961 | 186 | 180 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Elena Makarova | — | — | — | 1,755 | 59 | 72 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | Elena Makarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 14–13 | 51.9% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 31–15 | 67.4% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–17 | 34.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |