H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie vs Emanuela Zardo H2H: 1-0

Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie holds a 1–0 lead over Emanuela Zardo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie won the 1994 Prague round of 32 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
ROU Age 53 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Emanuela Zardo
SUI Age 56 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie 6-2 6-4 Emanuela Zardo #52 Match data May 13, 1994* R32 Prague Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie — — — 1,960 186 182 50.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Emanuela Zardo #976 #27 80 1,756 69 75 47.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Emanuela Zardo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1987 0–1 0.0% #258 1,488 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1988 0–1 0.0% #283 1,476 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1989 0–3 0.0% #142 1,449 0 0
20 1993 13–15 46.4% — 1,584 0 0 1990 13–12 52.0% #63 1,593 0 0
21 1994 10–15 40.0% — 1,590 0 0 1991 17–11 60.7% #31 1,714 0 1
22 1995 17–16 51.5% — 1,663 0 0 1992 18–15 54.5% #39 1,740 0 1
23 1996 31–16 66.0% — 1,845 0 3 1993 12–16 42.9% #73 1,650 0 1
24 1997 37–26 58.7% — 1,778 0 4 1994 9–13 40.9% #89 1,574 0 1
25 1998 18–25 41.9% — 1,696 0 4 1995 0–3 0.0% #181 1,542 0 1
26 1999 30–22 57.7% — 1,831 0 4 — — — — — — —
27 2000 20–25 44.4% — 1,671 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 2001 9–17 34.6% — 1,542 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2003 0–2 0.0% — 1,510 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 2004 1–3 25.0% — 1,504 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Emanuela Zardo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1993 3 7 10 30.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1994 2 5 7 28.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 1 4 5 20.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1995 5 5 10 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1996 7 6 13 53.8% 16 5 21 76.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1997 11 12 23 47.8% 20 9 29 69.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1994 6 5 11 54.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1995 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 12 10 22 54.5% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 7 12 19 36.8% 9 7 16 56.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 5 4 9 55.6% 2 10 12 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 62 75 137 45.3% 95 64 159 59.7% 19 16 35 54.3% 10 27 37 27.0% — 15 25 40 37.5% 49 38 87 56.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 9 13 30.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Emanuela Zardo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1488 96.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.01
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1477 101.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.05
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1450 99.4 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 — — +0.13
20 1993 1584 120.7 — — — — -73 +68 +30 45.8% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 101.1 +0.86 1990 1594 122.2 — — — — -34 -2 — 50.9% +0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 102.9 +0.71
21 1994 1590 113.2 — — — — -94 +83 — 44.1% -0.53 3–6 (33%) 0–5 (0%) 94.7 +0.90 1991 1714 136.8 — — — — -190 +100 — 58.1% +0.87 4–2 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 101.3 +0.08
22 1995 1663 135.9 — — — — -137 +102 — 51.9% +0.39 5–6 (45%) 5–1 (83%) 102.1 +0.99 1992 1741 131.9 — — — — -208 +113 — 51.4% -0.15 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 106.9 -0.32
23 1996 1846 133.4 — — — — -211 +41 -120 59.3% +0.43 16–5 (76%) 9–2 (82%) 115.9 +0.11 1993 1651 114.5 — — — — -126 +136 — 41.9% -0.50 4–2 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 104.1 +0.44
24 1997 1778 145.5 — — — — -116 +159 +33 55.0% +0.30 15–10 (60%) 6–4 (60%) 106.6 +0.55 1994 1575 109.2 — — — — -11 +87 — 41.7% -0.46 2–2 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 97.3 +1.56
25 1998 1696 144.6 — — — — -43 +199 — 46.9% -0.16 4–10 (29%) 5–4 (56%) 96.4 -0.86 1995 1542 100.6 — — — — -20 — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — -0.22
26 1999 1832 151.2 — — — — -61 +71 -133 55.6% +0.52 8–5 (62%) 4–5 (44%) 103.8 -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 1672 134.5 — — — — -57 +196 +97 48.1% -0.24 6–10 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 97.6 -1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 1543 113.9 — — — — +72 +132 +197 37.3% -0.58 3–6 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 91.5 +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 1511 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1505 112.3 +1.16 +0.66 0.673 41.2% +91 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1960 141.7 +1.16 +0.66 0.673 41.2% -80 +118 +9 50.4% +0.05 64–61 (51%) 38–33 (54%) 105.1 +0.35 — 1756 126.9 — — — — -99 +89 — 47.0% -0.14 20–13 (61%) 14–17 (45%) 105.2 +1.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.