H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 1-1
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie and Judith Wiesner are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Judith Wiesner leads 1–0 on clay, while Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie won the 1997 Australian Open first round 4-6 6-3 10-8.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 53
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 1997* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 4-6 6-3 10-8 | Judith Wiesner | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1995* | Styria | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Judith Wiesner | 7-6 6-3 | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | — | — | — | 1,961 | 186 | 180 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | Judith Wiesner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 31–15 | 67.4% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–17 | 34.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 |