H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 1-1

Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie and Kimiko Date Krumm are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie leads 1–0 on clay, while Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1996 Indian Wells third round 6-7 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
Age 53 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 11, 1996* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-7 6-1 6-2 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data
May 27, 1993* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie 4-6 6-2 6-3 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie — — — 1,961 186 180 50.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1993 13–15 46.4% — 1,584 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1994 10–15 40.0% — 1,589 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1995 17–16 51.5% — 1,664 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1996 31–15 67.4% — 1,849 0 3 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 1997 37–26 58.7% — 1,778 0 4 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 1998 18–25 41.9% — 1,696 0 4 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 1999 30–22 57.7% — 1,832 0 4 — — — — — — —
27 2000 20–24 45.5% — 1,685 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 2001 9–17 34.6% — 1,547 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2003 0–2 0.0% — 1,515 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 2004 1–3 25.0% — 1,508 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8