H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie vs Mariaan De Swardt H2H: 2-0
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie holds a 2–0 lead over Mariaan De Swardt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie won the 1999 Roland Garros third round 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 53
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 55
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 1999* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Mariaan De Swardt | Match data |
| Jun 20, 1996* | Rosmalen | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | Mariaan De Swardt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | — | — | — | 1,961 | 186 | 180 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Mariaan De Swardt | — | — | — | 1,784 | 65 | 81 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | Mariaan De Swardt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 31–15 | 67.4% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–17 | 34.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |