H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie vs Nana Smith H2H: 0-1
Nana Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nana Smith leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nana Smith won the 1996 Key Biscayne first round 5-7 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 53
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 1996* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Nana Smith | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | — | — | — | 1,961 | 186 | 180 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Nana Smith | #669 | #51 | 332 | 1,649 | 65 | 114 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | Nana Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #113 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #144 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #317 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 31–15 | 67.4% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #105 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–17 | 34.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |