H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie vs Naoko Kijimuta H2H: 2-0
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie holds a 2–0 lead over Naoko Kijimuta in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie won the 1997 Manhattan Beach third round 7-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 53
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 54
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 1997* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 7-6 7-5 | Naoko Kijimuta | Match data |
| Mar 10, 1996* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | Naoko Kijimuta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | — | — | — | 1,961 | 186 | 180 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Naoko Kijimuta | #538 | #44 | 529 | 1,696 | 37 | 57 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | Naoko Kijimuta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #156 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 31–15 | 67.4% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #45 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #74 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #279 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–17 | 34.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |