H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie vs Naoko Sawamatsu H2H: 2-0
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie holds a 2–0 lead over Naoko Sawamatsu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie won the 1998 Hilton Head third round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 53
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 53
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 1998* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 6-0 6-2 | Naoko Sawamatsu | Match data |
| Jun 4, 1995* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | Naoko Sawamatsu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | — | — | — | 1,961 | 186 | 180 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Naoko Sawamatsu | #266 | #14 | 881 | 1,971 | 182 | 127 | 58.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | Naoko Sawamatsu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #31 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #28 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1994 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1995 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1996 | 31–15 | 67.4% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #38 | 1,807 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #34 | 1,847 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #55 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1999 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–17 | 34.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |