H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie vs Paola Suarez H2H: 2-1
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie holds a 2–1 lead over Paola Suarez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie won the 1999 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 53
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1999* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 6-4 6-1 | Paola Suarez | Match data |
| Apr 11, 1996* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Paola Suarez | 7-5 6-2 | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | Match data |
| Oct 30, 1993* | Curitiba | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 6-4 7-5 | Paola Suarez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | — | — | — | 1,961 | 186 | 180 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Paola Suarez | #525 | #9 | 2,081 | 1,916 | 223 | 180 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | Paola Suarez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #114 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #118 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #80 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 31–15 | 67.4% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #36 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–17 | 34.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #238 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #178 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |