H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 2-1

Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie holds a 2–1 lead over Sandra Cecchini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie leads 2–0 on clay, while Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie won the 1995 Styria quarterfinal 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
ROU Age 53 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie 6-1 6-2 Sandra Cecchini #49 Match data Jul 29, 1995* QF Styria Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Sandra Cecchini #47 6-3 0-6 6-3 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data Sep 23, 1994* R16 Moscow Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie 6-2 4-6 6-1 Sandra Cecchini #57 Match data May 26, 1994* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie — — — 1,960 186 182 50.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,936 300 217 58.0% 0 0 0 2 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1993 13–15 46.4% — 1,584 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1994 10–15 40.0% — 1,590 0 0 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,633 0 3
22 1995 17–16 51.5% — 1,663 0 0 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,859 0 5
23 1996 31–16 66.0% — 1,845 0 3 1988 34–15 69.4% #21 1,843 0 7
24 1997 37–26 58.7% — 1,778 0 4 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1998 18–25 41.9% — 1,696 0 4 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,814 0 9
26 1999 30–22 57.7% — 1,831 0 4 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,773 0 10
27 2000 20–25 44.4% — 1,671 0 4 1992 24–16 60.0% #34 1,823 0 11
28 2001 9–17 34.6% — 1,542 0 4 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,726 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 2003 0–2 0.0% — 1,510 0 4 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 2004 1–3 25.0% — 1,504 0 4 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,628 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,608 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,555 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Sandra Cecchini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 12 4 16 75.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1993 3 7 10 30.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1994 2 5 7 28.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 1995 5 5 10 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1987 8 4 12 66.7% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1996 7 6 13 53.8% 16 5 21 76.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 29 8 37 78.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1997 11 12 23 47.8% 20 9 29 69.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1999 12 10 22 54.5% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 21 9 30 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2000 7 12 19 36.8% 9 7 16 56.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
28 2001 5 4 9 55.6% 2 10 12 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
30 2003 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2004 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
Career — 62 75 137 45.3% 95 64 159 59.7% 19 16 35 54.3% 10 27 37 27.0% — 40 42 82 48.8% 236 140 376 62.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 21 26 47 44.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Sandra Cecchini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1478 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1484 101.9 — — — — — +37 — 44.4% +0.11 1–0 — — +0.65
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1497 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.17
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1651 123.3 — — — — +49 -79 -56 53.9% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 +2.06
20 1993 1584 120.7 — — — — -73 +68 +30 45.8% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 101.1 +0.86 1985 1747 132.3 — — — — -80 +43 — 51.1% -0.19 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.71
21 1994 1590 113.2 — — — — -94 +83 — 44.1% -0.53 3–6 (33%) 0–5 (0%) 94.7 +0.90 1986 1633 120.0 — — — — -65 +149 — 43.2% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 96.0 +0.42
22 1995 1663 135.9 — — — — -137 +102 — 51.9% +0.39 5–6 (45%) 5–1 (83%) 102.1 +0.99 1987 1859 148.1 — — — — -141 +79 — 66.7% +1.10 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.44
23 1996 1846 133.4 — — — — -211 +41 -120 59.3% +0.43 16–5 (76%) 9–2 (82%) 115.9 +0.11 1988 1843 145.8 — — — — -149 +157 — 64.2% +1.10 9–2 (82%) 5–2 (71%) 107.7 +2.46
24 1997 1778 145.5 — — — — -116 +159 +33 55.0% +0.30 15–10 (60%) 6–4 (60%) 106.6 +0.55 1989 1799 128.9 — — — — -134 +134 — 59.4% +0.59 13–7 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 99.8 +3.27
25 1998 1696 144.6 — — — — -43 +199 — 46.9% -0.16 4–10 (29%) 5–4 (56%) 96.4 -0.86 1990 1815 140.5 — — — — -136 +130 — 60.0% +0.83 10–5 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.82
26 1999 1832 151.2 — — — — -61 +71 -133 55.6% +0.52 8–5 (62%) 4–5 (44%) 103.8 -0.42 1991 1774 131.6 — — — — -138 +151 — 61.3% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 +1.96
27 2000 1672 134.5 — — — — -57 +196 +97 48.1% -0.24 6–10 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 97.6 -1.14 1992 1824 136.5 — — — — -222 +141 — 55.6% +0.29 8–2 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +0.11
28 2001 1543 113.9 — — — — +72 +132 +197 37.3% -0.58 3–6 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 91.5 +0.37 1993 1727 129.9 — — — — -151 +131 — 53.9% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 101.3 -0.35
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1841 138.9 — — — — -123 +6 — 57.0% +0.51 14–5 (74%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 +0.57
30 2003 1511 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.12 1995 1661 113.4 — — — — +36 +34 — 40.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 +0.31
31 2004 1505 112.3 +1.16 +0.66 0.673 41.2% +91 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.20 1996 1629 109.5 — — — — +14 +62 — 52.4% +0.05 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.57
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1608 106.4 — — — — — +32 — 39.1% -1.30 0–1 2–0 — -0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1555 95.4 — — — — — +15 — 34.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.33
Career — 1960 141.7 +1.16 +0.66 0.673 41.2% -80 +118 +9 50.4% +0.05 64–61 (51%) 38–33 (54%) 105.1 +0.35 — 1936 137.9 — — — — -93 +97 -56 55.5% +0.35 98–62 (61%) 42–34 (55%) 106.0 +2.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.