H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie vs Wiltrud Probst H2H: 1-1
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie and Wiltrud Probst are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wiltrud Probst leads 1–0 on carpet, while Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie won the 1996 Hamburg third round 3-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 53
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 1996* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Wiltrud Probst | Match data |
| Feb 26, 1993* | Linz | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Wiltrud Probst | 6-3 6-3 | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | — | — | — | 1,961 | 186 | 180 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Wiltrud Probst | #794 | #31 | 344 | 1,757 | 119 | 161 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | Wiltrud Probst | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #80 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1995 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 31–15 | 67.4% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #105 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #69 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #113 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–17 | 34.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |